All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [RFC 0/2] script to find package licenses
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 18:33:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160804183335.0947f9a9@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470320164-8241-1-git-send-email-rahul.bedarkar@imgtec.com>

Hello,

On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 19:46:02 +0530, Rahul Bedarkar wrote:

> Legal information is a kind of thing that we can't automate completely.
> But we want it to be correct when new package is added or version bumps.
> 
> This patch set attempts to add a script to find license information from
> package source files to verify or correct legal info for buildroot packages.
> 
> Legal information may get outdated with version bumps or even may not get
> correct in first place if source package does not provide any license files.
> In such cases, we need to look into file header to get that information.
> But it could be very difficult if there are number of source files.
> 
> find-licenses script scans package source files for known licenses to
> find under which license package is released. It aggregates license
> information for all source files found in a package.
> 
> For finding license, we rely on file's license header. Generally
> most of packages use standard license headers which helps us to detect
> license of packages.
> 
> Currently it supports notable licenses. But we can later add other
> licenses based on regx.
> 
> Script outputs licenses found on standard output file-wise, directory-
> wise and final aggregation of all licenses found. It also lists files
> which don't have license header. Directory-wise license listing will be
> useful when different components are licensed under different license.
> 
> Since final license list is just aggregation of licenses found for all
> source files, we can not surely say if package is dual or
> multi-licensed or different components are licensed under different
> license. That's why we can't use final license list directly in our
> package .mk file, but it at least helps us to find or verify license
> information quickly.

Thanks for this proposal. However, there are already some tools that do
the same thing I believe. I'm thinking especially at the tools used by
the Fossology project (https://www.fossology.org/). It is surely more
complicated to install and use that your Python script, but it is also
a lot more complete, and even more importantly: maintained by other
people.

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-08-04 16:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-04 14:16 [Buildroot] [RFC 0/2] script to find package licenses Rahul Bedarkar
2016-08-04 14:16 ` [Buildroot] [RFC 1/2] scripts: add a script to find licenses of package Rahul Bedarkar
2016-08-04 14:16 ` [Buildroot] [RFC 2/2] new make target <PKG>-find-licenses Rahul Bedarkar
2016-08-04 16:33 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2016-08-05  2:03   ` [Buildroot] [RFC 0/2] script to find package licenses Khem Raj
2016-08-05  7:42   ` Rahul Bedarkar
2016-08-05  7:53     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-08-08 17:42       ` Yann E. MORIN

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160804183335.0947f9a9@free-electrons.com \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.