From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752511AbcHHNTR (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 8 Aug 2016 09:19:17 -0400
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:49087 "EHLO
	mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752077AbcHHNTQ (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 8 Aug 2016 09:19:16 -0400
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 15:19:30 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com>,
        "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        andi@firstfloor.org
Subject: Re: Strange behavior of perf top with PEBS
Message-ID: <20160808131930.GB9357@kroah.com>
References: <578F7C82.6090500@kyup.com>
 <20160720143417.GA25992@krava>
 <20160720143842.GB25992@krava>
 <579749E6.1030408@kyup.com>
 <20160804152926.GA25592@krava>
 <57A45CB8.4040909@kyup.com>
 <20160805102320.GB12528@krava>
 <20160808130343.GF6879@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160808130343.GF6879@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2 (2016-07-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 03:03:43PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:23:20PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:30:32PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On 08/04/2016 06:29 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 02:30:46PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> > > [SNIP]
> > > > 
> > > > sorry for late response..
> > > > 
> > > > I checked on f22 kernel and it's missing the core2 PEBs fix:
> > > >   1424a09a9e18 perf/x86: fix PEBS issues on Intel Atom/Core2
> > > > 
> > > > which was introduced in 4.5.. you should upgrade or include
> > > > this patch
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Thanks for the reply. Isn't this supposed to be tagged as stable since
> > > it essentially breaks the default invocation of perf top?
> > 
> > yep, it seems like good one to have in stable, Peter?
> 
> Greg, could you pick:
> 
>   1424a09a9e18 ("perf/x86: fix PEBS issues on Intel Atom/Core2")
> 
> Into 4.4-stable ?

Now queued up, thanks.

greg k-h