All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <20160808164828.GH12649@leverpostej>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 5f5c369..75ab106 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -42,23 +42,3 @@ On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 12:03:38PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
 >  	ret
 >  ENDPROC(cpu_do_idle)
 > +	.popsection
-
-From a quick scan it looks like we only call this with interrupts
-disabled, and we have no NMI. So shouldn't we be annotating
-arch_cpu_idle(), which calls this and subsequently enables interrupts?
-
-I'm also not sure what you need to do for PSCI, which is the preferred
-(FW-backed) idle mechanism for arm64. The infrastrucure for that is
-spread over a few files:
-
-  arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S
-  arch/arm64/kernel/smccc-call.S
-  arch/arm64/kernel/suspend.c
-  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c
-  drivers/firmware/psci.c
-
-I'm not sure where we'd be an an interruptible state, and therefore I'm
-not immediately sure what we should annotate.
-
-Thanks,
-Mark.
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 85478ef..20ca784 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -63,26 +63,6 @@
  ">  \twfi\n"
  ">  \tret\n"
  ">  ENDPROC(cpu_do_idle)\n"
- "> +\t.popsection\n"
- "\n"
- "From a quick scan it looks like we only call this with interrupts\n"
- "disabled, and we have no NMI. So shouldn't we be annotating\n"
- "arch_cpu_idle(), which calls this and subsequently enables interrupts?\n"
- "\n"
- "I'm also not sure what you need to do for PSCI, which is the preferred\n"
- "(FW-backed) idle mechanism for arm64. The infrastrucure for that is\n"
- "spread over a few files:\n"
- "\n"
- "  arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S\n"
- "  arch/arm64/kernel/smccc-call.S\n"
- "  arch/arm64/kernel/suspend.c\n"
- "  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c\n"
- "  drivers/firmware/psci.c\n"
- "\n"
- "I'm not sure where we'd be an an interruptible state, and therefore I'm\n"
- "not immediately sure what we should annotate.\n"
- "\n"
- "Thanks,\n"
- Mark.
+ "> +\t.popsection"
 
-e4e507510e0064bc080b7c09f0e3d3e2a9edbbd1938f8050fba86975f88685aa
+6de7ecd7471d3b0d64933895b56a6051c2a6dfc65804a49bc24fb95e75f78376

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt
index 5f5c369..e7dfd07 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N2/1.txt
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 12:03:38PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
 >  ENDPROC(cpu_do_idle)
 > +	.popsection
 
-From a quick scan it looks like we only call this with interrupts
+>From a quick scan it looks like we only call this with interrupts
 disabled, and we have no NMI. So shouldn't we be annotating
 arch_cpu_idle(), which calls this and subsequently enables interrupts?
 
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest
index 85478ef..beb2c14 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N2/content_digest
@@ -1,23 +1,9 @@
  "ref\01470672218-16059-1-git-send-email-cmetcalf@mellanox.com\0"
  "ref\01470672218-16059-5-git-send-email-cmetcalf@mellanox.com\0"
- "From\0Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v7 4/4] nmi_backtrace: generate one-line reports for idle cpus\0"
+ "From\0mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)\0"
+ "Subject\0[PATCH v7 4/4] nmi_backtrace: generate one-line reports for idle cpus\0"
  "Date\0Mon, 8 Aug 2016 17:48:28 +0100\0"
- "To\0Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>"
- " lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com\0"
- "Cc\0Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>"
-  Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
-  Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
-  Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
-  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-  Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com>
-  Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
-  Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
-  Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
-  x86@kernel.org
-  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
-  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
- " linux-arch@vger.kernel.org\0"
+ "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "Hi,\n"
@@ -65,7 +51,7 @@
  ">  ENDPROC(cpu_do_idle)\n"
  "> +\t.popsection\n"
  "\n"
- "From a quick scan it looks like we only call this with interrupts\n"
+ ">From a quick scan it looks like we only call this with interrupts\n"
  "disabled, and we have no NMI. So shouldn't we be annotating\n"
  "arch_cpu_idle(), which calls this and subsequently enables interrupts?\n"
  "\n"
@@ -85,4 +71,4 @@
  "Thanks,\n"
  Mark.
 
-e4e507510e0064bc080b7c09f0e3d3e2a9edbbd1938f8050fba86975f88685aa
+67ca2c841de9bdbf631f62655d60af2cfed54e877acb8b6af541447dfee007ba

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N3/1.txt
index 5f5c369..e7dfd07 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N3/1.txt
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 12:03:38PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
 >  ENDPROC(cpu_do_idle)
 > +	.popsection
 
-From a quick scan it looks like we only call this with interrupts
+>From a quick scan it looks like we only call this with interrupts
 disabled, and we have no NMI. So shouldn't we be annotating
 arch_cpu_idle(), which calls this and subsequently enables interrupts?
 
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N3/content_digest
index 85478ef..a5383b5 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N3/content_digest
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
  ">  ENDPROC(cpu_do_idle)\n"
  "> +\t.popsection\n"
  "\n"
- "From a quick scan it looks like we only call this with interrupts\n"
+ ">From a quick scan it looks like we only call this with interrupts\n"
  "disabled, and we have no NMI. So shouldn't we be annotating\n"
  "arch_cpu_idle(), which calls this and subsequently enables interrupts?\n"
  "\n"
@@ -85,4 +85,4 @@
  "Thanks,\n"
  Mark.
 
-e4e507510e0064bc080b7c09f0e3d3e2a9edbbd1938f8050fba86975f88685aa
+8731af39fbdd66cebbb232e69e9f11f5a12aa902b37d181dfc5897d215a48288

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.