[PATCH] libnvdimm, nd_blk: mask off reserved status bits

[PATCH] libnvdimm, nd_blk: mask off reserved status bits

[Ross Zwisler]

The "NVDIMM Block Window Driver Writer's Guide":

http://pmem.io/documents/
http://pmem.io/documents/NVDIMM_DriverWritersGuide-July-2016.pdf

defines the layout of the block window status register.  For the July 2016
version of the spec linked to above, this happens in Figure 4 on page 26.

The only bits defined in this spec are bits 31, 5, 4, 2, 1 and 0.  The rest
of the bits in the status register are reserved, and there is a warning
following the diagram that says:

  Note: The driver cannot assume the value of the RESERVED bits in the
  status register are zero. These reserved bits need to be masked off, and
  the driver must avoid checking the state of those bits.

This change ensures that for hardware implementations that set these
reserved bits in the status register, the driver won't incorrectly fail the
block I/Os.

Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/acpi/nfit.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
index 1f0e060..375c10f 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
@@ -1396,11 +1396,12 @@ static u32 read_blk_stat(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw)
 {
 	struct nfit_blk_mmio *mmio = &nfit_blk->mmio[DCR];
 	u64 offset = nfit_blk->stat_offset + mmio->size * bw;
+	const u32 STATUS_MASK = 0x80000037;
 
 	if (mmio->num_lines)
 		offset = to_interleave_offset(offset, mmio);
 
-	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset);
+	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset) & STATUS_MASK;
 }
 
 static void write_blk_ctl(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw,
-- 
2.9.0

[PATCH] libnvdimm, nd_blk: mask off reserved status bits

[Ross Zwisler]

The "NVDIMM Block Window Driver Writer's Guide":

http://pmem.io/documents/
http://pmem.io/documents/NVDIMM_DriverWritersGuide-July-2016.pdf

defines the layout of the block window status register.  For the July 2016
version of the spec linked to above, this happens in Figure 4 on page 26.

The only bits defined in this spec are bits 31, 5, 4, 2, 1 and 0.  The rest
of the bits in the status register are reserved, and there is a warning
following the diagram that says:

  Note: The driver cannot assume the value of the RESERVED bits in the
  status register are zero. These reserved bits need to be masked off, and
  the driver must avoid checking the state of those bits.

This change ensures that for hardware implementations that set these
reserved bits in the status register, the driver won't incorrectly fail the
block I/Os.

Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/acpi/nfit.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
index 1f0e060..375c10f 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
@@ -1396,11 +1396,12 @@ static u32 read_blk_stat(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw)
 {
 	struct nfit_blk_mmio *mmio = &nfit_blk->mmio[DCR];
 	u64 offset = nfit_blk->stat_offset + mmio->size * bw;
+	const u32 STATUS_MASK = 0x80000037;
 
 	if (mmio->num_lines)
 		offset = to_interleave_offset(offset, mmio);
 
-	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset);
+	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset) & STATUS_MASK;
 }
 
 static void write_blk_ctl(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw,
-- 
2.9.0

[PATCH] libnvdimm, nd_blk: mask off reserved status bits

[Ross Zwisler]

The "NVDIMM Block Window Driver Writer's Guide":

http://pmem.io/documents/
http://pmem.io/documents/NVDIMM_DriverWritersGuide-July-2016.pdf

defines the layout of the block window status register.  For the July 2016
version of the spec linked to above, this happens in Figure 4 on page 26.

The only bits defined in this spec are bits 31, 5, 4, 2, 1 and 0.  The rest
of the bits in the status register are reserved, and there is a warning
following the diagram that says:

  Note: The driver cannot assume the value of the RESERVED bits in the
  status register are zero. These reserved bits need to be masked off, and
  the driver must avoid checking the state of those bits.

This change ensures that for hardware implementations that set these
reserved bits in the status register, the driver won't incorrectly fail the
block I/Os.

Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/acpi/nfit.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
index 1f0e060..375c10f 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
@@ -1396,11 +1396,12 @@ static u32 read_blk_stat(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw)
 {
 	struct nfit_blk_mmio *mmio = &nfit_blk->mmio[DCR];
 	u64 offset = nfit_blk->stat_offset + mmio->size * bw;
+	const u32 STATUS_MASK = 0x80000037;
 
 	if (mmio->num_lines)
 		offset = to_interleave_offset(offset, mmio);
 
-	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset);
+	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset) & STATUS_MASK;
 }
 
 static void write_blk_ctl(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw,
-- 
2.9.0

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

Re: [PATCH] libnvdimm, nd_blk: mask off reserved status bits

[joeyli]

Hi Ross,

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 02:59:12PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> The "NVDIMM Block Window Driver Writer's Guide":
> 
> http://pmem.io/documents/
> http://pmem.io/documents/NVDIMM_DriverWritersGuide-July-2016.pdf
> 
> defines the layout of the block window status register.  For the July 2016
> version of the spec linked to above, this happens in Figure 4 on page 26.
> 
> The only bits defined in this spec are bits 31, 5, 4, 2, 1 and 0.  The rest
> of the bits in the status register are reserved, and there is a warning
> following the diagram that says:
> 
>   Note: The driver cannot assume the value of the RESERVED bits in the
>   status register are zero. These reserved bits need to be masked off, and
>   the driver must avoid checking the state of those bits.
> 
> This change ensures that for hardware implementations that set these
> reserved bits in the status register, the driver won't incorrectly fail the
> block I/Os.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/nfit.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
> index 1f0e060..375c10f 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c

The drivers/acpi/nfit.c is moved to drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c

> @@ -1396,11 +1396,12 @@ static u32 read_blk_stat(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw)
>  {
>  	struct nfit_blk_mmio *mmio = &nfit_blk->mmio[DCR];
>  	u64 offset = nfit_blk->stat_offset + mmio->size * bw;
> +	const u32 STATUS_MASK = 0x80000037;
>  
>  	if (mmio->num_lines)
>  		offset = to_interleave_offset(offset, mmio);
>  
> -	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset);
> +	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset) & STATUS_MASK;
>  }
>  
>  static void write_blk_ctl(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw,
> -- 
> 2.9.0

Other parts are good to me.

Reviewed-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>

Regards
Joey Lee

Re: [PATCH] libnvdimm, nd_blk: mask off reserved status bits

[joeyli]

Hi Ross,

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 02:59:12PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> The "NVDIMM Block Window Driver Writer's Guide":
> 
> http://pmem.io/documents/
> http://pmem.io/documents/NVDIMM_DriverWritersGuide-July-2016.pdf
> 
> defines the layout of the block window status register.  For the July 2016
> version of the spec linked to above, this happens in Figure 4 on page 26.
> 
> The only bits defined in this spec are bits 31, 5, 4, 2, 1 and 0.  The rest
> of the bits in the status register are reserved, and there is a warning
> following the diagram that says:
> 
>   Note: The driver cannot assume the value of the RESERVED bits in the
>   status register are zero. These reserved bits need to be masked off, and
>   the driver must avoid checking the state of those bits.
> 
> This change ensures that for hardware implementations that set these
> reserved bits in the status register, the driver won't incorrectly fail the
> block I/Os.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/nfit.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
> index 1f0e060..375c10f 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c

The drivers/acpi/nfit.c is moved to drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c

> @@ -1396,11 +1396,12 @@ static u32 read_blk_stat(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw)
>  {
>  	struct nfit_blk_mmio *mmio = &nfit_blk->mmio[DCR];
>  	u64 offset = nfit_blk->stat_offset + mmio->size * bw;
> +	const u32 STATUS_MASK = 0x80000037;
>  
>  	if (mmio->num_lines)
>  		offset = to_interleave_offset(offset, mmio);
>  
> -	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset);
> +	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset) & STATUS_MASK;
>  }
>  
>  static void write_blk_ctl(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw,
> -- 
> 2.9.0

Other parts are good to me.

Reviewed-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com>

Regards
Joey Lee

Re: [PATCH] libnvdimm, nd_blk: mask off reserved status bits

[joeyli]

Hi Ross,

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 02:59:12PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> The "NVDIMM Block Window Driver Writer's Guide":
> 
> http://pmem.io/documents/
> http://pmem.io/documents/NVDIMM_DriverWritersGuide-July-2016.pdf
> 
> defines the layout of the block window status register.  For the July 2016
> version of the spec linked to above, this happens in Figure 4 on page 26.
> 
> The only bits defined in this spec are bits 31, 5, 4, 2, 1 and 0.  The rest
> of the bits in the status register are reserved, and there is a warning
> following the diagram that says:
> 
>   Note: The driver cannot assume the value of the RESERVED bits in the
>   status register are zero. These reserved bits need to be masked off, and
>   the driver must avoid checking the state of those bits.
> 
> This change ensures that for hardware implementations that set these
> reserved bits in the status register, the driver won't incorrectly fail the
> block I/Os.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/nfit.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
> index 1f0e060..375c10f 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c

The drivers/acpi/nfit.c is moved to drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c

> @@ -1396,11 +1396,12 @@ static u32 read_blk_stat(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw)
>  {
>  	struct nfit_blk_mmio *mmio = &nfit_blk->mmio[DCR];
>  	u64 offset = nfit_blk->stat_offset + mmio->size * bw;
> +	const u32 STATUS_MASK = 0x80000037;
>  
>  	if (mmio->num_lines)
>  		offset = to_interleave_offset(offset, mmio);
>  
> -	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset);
> +	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset) & STATUS_MASK;
>  }
>  
>  static void write_blk_ctl(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw,
> -- 
> 2.9.0

Other parts are good to me.

Reviewed-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com>

Regards
Joey Lee

Re: [PATCH] libnvdimm, nd_blk: mask off reserved status bits

[joeyli]

Hi Ross,

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 02:59:12PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> The "NVDIMM Block Window Driver Writer's Guide":
> 
> http://pmem.io/documents/
> http://pmem.io/documents/NVDIMM_DriverWritersGuide-July-2016.pdf
> 
> defines the layout of the block window status register.  For the July 2016
> version of the spec linked to above, this happens in Figure 4 on page 26.
> 
> The only bits defined in this spec are bits 31, 5, 4, 2, 1 and 0.  The rest
> of the bits in the status register are reserved, and there is a warning
> following the diagram that says:
> 
>   Note: The driver cannot assume the value of the RESERVED bits in the
>   status register are zero. These reserved bits need to be masked off, and
>   the driver must avoid checking the state of those bits.
> 
> This change ensures that for hardware implementations that set these
> reserved bits in the status register, the driver won't incorrectly fail the
> block I/Os.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/nfit.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
> index 1f0e060..375c10f 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c

The drivers/acpi/nfit.c is moved to drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c

> @@ -1396,11 +1396,12 @@ static u32 read_blk_stat(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw)
>  {
>  	struct nfit_blk_mmio *mmio = &nfit_blk->mmio[DCR];
>  	u64 offset = nfit_blk->stat_offset + mmio->size * bw;
> +	const u32 STATUS_MASK = 0x80000037;
>  
>  	if (mmio->num_lines)
>  		offset = to_interleave_offset(offset, mmio);
>  
> -	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset);
> +	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset) & STATUS_MASK;
>  }
>  
>  static void write_blk_ctl(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw,
> -- 
> 2.9.0

Other parts are good to me.

Reviewed-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com>

Regards
Joey Lee
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

[PATCH v2] libnvdimm, nd_blk: mask off reserved status bits

[Ross Zwisler]

The "NVDIMM Block Window Driver Writer's Guide":

http://pmem.io/documents/
http://pmem.io/documents/NVDIMM_DriverWritersGuide-July-2016.pdf

defines the layout of the block window status register.  For the July 2016
version of the spec linked to above, this happens in Figure 4 on page 26.

The only bits defined in this spec are bits 31, 5, 4, 2, 1 and 0.  The rest
of the bits in the status register are reserved, and there is a warning
following the diagram that says:

  Note: The driver cannot assume the value of the RESERVED bits in the
  status register are zero. These reserved bits need to be masked off, and
  the driver must avoid checking the state of those bits.

This change ensures that for hardware implementations that set these
reserved bits in the status register, the driver won't incorrectly fail the
block I/Os.

Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
Reviewed-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org # v4.2+
---

Changes from V1:
 - Rebased onto the v4.8 merge tree.  As Joey points out the ND BLK code
   recently moved from drivers/acpi/nfit.c to drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c.
   Since we were in the merge window for v4.8 I didn't know what to use as
   a baseline, so I just used v4.7, which was apparently incorrect.  Sorry
   about that.

 - Added Joey's reviewed-by.

For stable kernels v4.2 and beyond the v1 patch for drivers/acpi/nfit.c
applies cleanly and should be used.

---
 drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
index 8c234dd..80cc7c0 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
@@ -1527,11 +1527,12 @@ static u32 read_blk_stat(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw)
 {
 	struct nfit_blk_mmio *mmio = &nfit_blk->mmio[DCR];
 	u64 offset = nfit_blk->stat_offset + mmio->size * bw;
+	const u32 STATUS_MASK = 0x80000037;
 
 	if (mmio->num_lines)
 		offset = to_interleave_offset(offset, mmio);
 
-	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset);
+	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset) & STATUS_MASK;
 }
 
 static void write_blk_ctl(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw,
-- 
2.9.0

[PATCH v2] libnvdimm, nd_blk: mask off reserved status bits

[Ross Zwisler]

The "NVDIMM Block Window Driver Writer's Guide":

http://pmem.io/documents/
http://pmem.io/documents/NVDIMM_DriverWritersGuide-July-2016.pdf

defines the layout of the block window status register.  For the July 2016
version of the spec linked to above, this happens in Figure 4 on page 26.

The only bits defined in this spec are bits 31, 5, 4, 2, 1 and 0.  The rest
of the bits in the status register are reserved, and there is a warning
following the diagram that says:

  Note: The driver cannot assume the value of the RESERVED bits in the
  status register are zero. These reserved bits need to be masked off, and
  the driver must avoid checking the state of those bits.

This change ensures that for hardware implementations that set these
reserved bits in the status register, the driver won't incorrectly fail the
block I/Os.

Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.2+
---

Changes from V1:
 - Rebased onto the v4.8 merge tree.  As Joey points out the ND BLK code
   recently moved from drivers/acpi/nfit.c to drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c.
   Since we were in the merge window for v4.8 I didn't know what to use as
   a baseline, so I just used v4.7, which was apparently incorrect.  Sorry
   about that.

 - Added Joey's reviewed-by.

For stable kernels v4.2 and beyond the v1 patch for drivers/acpi/nfit.c
applies cleanly and should be used.

---
 drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
index 8c234dd..80cc7c0 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
@@ -1527,11 +1527,12 @@ static u32 read_blk_stat(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw)
 {
 	struct nfit_blk_mmio *mmio = &nfit_blk->mmio[DCR];
 	u64 offset = nfit_blk->stat_offset + mmio->size * bw;
+	const u32 STATUS_MASK = 0x80000037;
 
 	if (mmio->num_lines)
 		offset = to_interleave_offset(offset, mmio);
 
-	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset);
+	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset) & STATUS_MASK;
 }
 
 static void write_blk_ctl(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw,
-- 
2.9.0

[PATCH v2] libnvdimm, nd_blk: mask off reserved status bits

[Ross Zwisler]

The "NVDIMM Block Window Driver Writer's Guide":

http://pmem.io/documents/
http://pmem.io/documents/NVDIMM_DriverWritersGuide-July-2016.pdf

defines the layout of the block window status register.  For the July 2016
version of the spec linked to above, this happens in Figure 4 on page 26.

The only bits defined in this spec are bits 31, 5, 4, 2, 1 and 0.  The rest
of the bits in the status register are reserved, and there is a warning
following the diagram that says:

  Note: The driver cannot assume the value of the RESERVED bits in the
  status register are zero. These reserved bits need to be masked off, and
  the driver must avoid checking the state of those bits.

This change ensures that for hardware implementations that set these
reserved bits in the status register, the driver won't incorrectly fail the
block I/Os.

Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.2+
---

Changes from V1:
 - Rebased onto the v4.8 merge tree.  As Joey points out the ND BLK code
   recently moved from drivers/acpi/nfit.c to drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c.
   Since we were in the merge window for v4.8 I didn't know what to use as
   a baseline, so I just used v4.7, which was apparently incorrect.  Sorry
   about that.

 - Added Joey's reviewed-by.

For stable kernels v4.2 and beyond the v1 patch for drivers/acpi/nfit.c
applies cleanly and should be used.

---
 drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
index 8c234dd..80cc7c0 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
@@ -1527,11 +1527,12 @@ static u32 read_blk_stat(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw)
 {
 	struct nfit_blk_mmio *mmio = &nfit_blk->mmio[DCR];
 	u64 offset = nfit_blk->stat_offset + mmio->size * bw;
+	const u32 STATUS_MASK = 0x80000037;
 
 	if (mmio->num_lines)
 		offset = to_interleave_offset(offset, mmio);
 
-	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset);
+	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset) & STATUS_MASK;
 }
 
 static void write_blk_ctl(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw,
-- 
2.9.0

[PATCH v2] libnvdimm, nd_blk: mask off reserved status bits

[Ross Zwisler]

The "NVDIMM Block Window Driver Writer's Guide":

http://pmem.io/documents/
http://pmem.io/documents/NVDIMM_DriverWritersGuide-July-2016.pdf

defines the layout of the block window status register.  For the July 2016
version of the spec linked to above, this happens in Figure 4 on page 26.

The only bits defined in this spec are bits 31, 5, 4, 2, 1 and 0.  The rest
of the bits in the status register are reserved, and there is a warning
following the diagram that says:

  Note: The driver cannot assume the value of the RESERVED bits in the
  status register are zero. These reserved bits need to be masked off, and
  the driver must avoid checking the state of those bits.

This change ensures that for hardware implementations that set these
reserved bits in the status register, the driver won't incorrectly fail the
block I/Os.

Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.2+
---

Changes from V1:
 - Rebased onto the v4.8 merge tree.  As Joey points out the ND BLK code
   recently moved from drivers/acpi/nfit.c to drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c.
   Since we were in the merge window for v4.8 I didn't know what to use as
   a baseline, so I just used v4.7, which was apparently incorrect.  Sorry
   about that.

 - Added Joey's reviewed-by.

For stable kernels v4.2 and beyond the v1 patch for drivers/acpi/nfit.c
applies cleanly and should be used.

---
 drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
index 8c234dd..80cc7c0 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
@@ -1527,11 +1527,12 @@ static u32 read_blk_stat(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw)
 {
 	struct nfit_blk_mmio *mmio = &nfit_blk->mmio[DCR];
 	u64 offset = nfit_blk->stat_offset + mmio->size * bw;
+	const u32 STATUS_MASK = 0x80000037;
 
 	if (mmio->num_lines)
 		offset = to_interleave_offset(offset, mmio);
 
-	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset);
+	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset) & STATUS_MASK;
 }
 
 static void write_blk_ctl(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw,
-- 
2.9.0

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

Re: [PATCH v2] libnvdimm, nd_blk: mask off reserved status bits

[Ross Zwisler]

On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 12:26:53PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> The "NVDIMM Block Window Driver Writer's Guide":
> 
> http://pmem.io/documents/
> http://pmem.io/documents/NVDIMM_DriverWritersGuide-July-2016.pdf
> 
> defines the layout of the block window status register.  For the July 2016
> version of the spec linked to above, this happens in Figure 4 on page 26.
> 
> The only bits defined in this spec are bits 31, 5, 4, 2, 1 and 0.  The rest
> of the bits in the status register are reserved, and there is a warning
> following the diagram that says:
> 
>   Note: The driver cannot assume the value of the RESERVED bits in the
>   status register are zero. These reserved bits need to be masked off, and
>   the driver must avoid checking the state of those bits.
> 
> This change ensures that for hardware implementations that set these
> reserved bits in the status register, the driver won't incorrectly fail the
> block I/Os.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
> Reviewed-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org # v4.2+

Ping on this patch - through which tree should we merge this for v4.8-rc2?
Dan's nvdimm tree?

> ---
> 
> Changes from V1:
>  - Rebased onto the v4.8 merge tree.  As Joey points out the ND BLK code
>    recently moved from drivers/acpi/nfit.c to drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c.
>    Since we were in the merge window for v4.8 I didn't know what to use as
>    a baseline, so I just used v4.7, which was apparently incorrect.  Sorry
>    about that.
> 
>  - Added Joey's reviewed-by.
> 
> For stable kernels v4.2 and beyond the v1 patch for drivers/acpi/nfit.c
> applies cleanly and should be used.
> 
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
> index 8c234dd..80cc7c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
> @@ -1527,11 +1527,12 @@ static u32 read_blk_stat(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw)
>  {
>  	struct nfit_blk_mmio *mmio = &nfit_blk->mmio[DCR];
>  	u64 offset = nfit_blk->stat_offset + mmio->size * bw;
> +	const u32 STATUS_MASK = 0x80000037;
>  
>  	if (mmio->num_lines)
>  		offset = to_interleave_offset(offset, mmio);
>  
> -	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset);
> +	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset) & STATUS_MASK;
>  }
>  
>  static void write_blk_ctl(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw,
> -- 
> 2.9.0
> 

Re: [PATCH v2] libnvdimm, nd_blk: mask off reserved status bits

[Ross Zwisler]

On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 12:26:53PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> The "NVDIMM Block Window Driver Writer's Guide":
> 
> http://pmem.io/documents/
> http://pmem.io/documents/NVDIMM_DriverWritersGuide-July-2016.pdf
> 
> defines the layout of the block window status register.  For the July 2016
> version of the spec linked to above, this happens in Figure 4 on page 26.
> 
> The only bits defined in this spec are bits 31, 5, 4, 2, 1 and 0.  The rest
> of the bits in the status register are reserved, and there is a warning
> following the diagram that says:
> 
>   Note: The driver cannot assume the value of the RESERVED bits in the
>   status register are zero. These reserved bits need to be masked off, and
>   the driver must avoid checking the state of those bits.
> 
> This change ensures that for hardware implementations that set these
> reserved bits in the status register, the driver won't incorrectly fail the
> block I/Os.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.2+

Ping on this patch - through which tree should we merge this for v4.8-rc2?
Dan's nvdimm tree?

> ---
> 
> Changes from V1:
>  - Rebased onto the v4.8 merge tree.  As Joey points out the ND BLK code
>    recently moved from drivers/acpi/nfit.c to drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c.
>    Since we were in the merge window for v4.8 I didn't know what to use as
>    a baseline, so I just used v4.7, which was apparently incorrect.  Sorry
>    about that.
> 
>  - Added Joey's reviewed-by.
> 
> For stable kernels v4.2 and beyond the v1 patch for drivers/acpi/nfit.c
> applies cleanly and should be used.
> 
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
> index 8c234dd..80cc7c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
> @@ -1527,11 +1527,12 @@ static u32 read_blk_stat(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw)
>  {
>  	struct nfit_blk_mmio *mmio = &nfit_blk->mmio[DCR];
>  	u64 offset = nfit_blk->stat_offset + mmio->size * bw;
> +	const u32 STATUS_MASK = 0x80000037;
>  
>  	if (mmio->num_lines)
>  		offset = to_interleave_offset(offset, mmio);
>  
> -	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset);
> +	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset) & STATUS_MASK;
>  }
>  
>  static void write_blk_ctl(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw,
> -- 
> 2.9.0
> 

Re: [PATCH v2] libnvdimm, nd_blk: mask off reserved status bits

[Ross Zwisler]

On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 12:26:53PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> The "NVDIMM Block Window Driver Writer's Guide":
> 
> http://pmem.io/documents/
> http://pmem.io/documents/NVDIMM_DriverWritersGuide-July-2016.pdf
> 
> defines the layout of the block window status register.  For the July 2016
> version of the spec linked to above, this happens in Figure 4 on page 26.
> 
> The only bits defined in this spec are bits 31, 5, 4, 2, 1 and 0.  The rest
> of the bits in the status register are reserved, and there is a warning
> following the diagram that says:
> 
>   Note: The driver cannot assume the value of the RESERVED bits in the
>   status register are zero. These reserved bits need to be masked off, and
>   the driver must avoid checking the state of those bits.
> 
> This change ensures that for hardware implementations that set these
> reserved bits in the status register, the driver won't incorrectly fail the
> block I/Os.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.2+

Ping on this patch - through which tree should we merge this for v4.8-rc2?
Dan's nvdimm tree?

> ---
> 
> Changes from V1:
>  - Rebased onto the v4.8 merge tree.  As Joey points out the ND BLK code
>    recently moved from drivers/acpi/nfit.c to drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c.
>    Since we were in the merge window for v4.8 I didn't know what to use as
>    a baseline, so I just used v4.7, which was apparently incorrect.  Sorry
>    about that.
> 
>  - Added Joey's reviewed-by.
> 
> For stable kernels v4.2 and beyond the v1 patch for drivers/acpi/nfit.c
> applies cleanly and should be used.
> 
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
> index 8c234dd..80cc7c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
> @@ -1527,11 +1527,12 @@ static u32 read_blk_stat(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw)
>  {
>  	struct nfit_blk_mmio *mmio = &nfit_blk->mmio[DCR];
>  	u64 offset = nfit_blk->stat_offset + mmio->size * bw;
> +	const u32 STATUS_MASK = 0x80000037;
>  
>  	if (mmio->num_lines)
>  		offset = to_interleave_offset(offset, mmio);
>  
> -	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset);
> +	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset) & STATUS_MASK;
>  }
>  
>  static void write_blk_ctl(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw,
> -- 
> 2.9.0
> 

Re: [PATCH v2] libnvdimm, nd_blk: mask off reserved status bits

[Ross Zwisler]

On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 12:26:53PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> The "NVDIMM Block Window Driver Writer's Guide":
> 
> http://pmem.io/documents/
> http://pmem.io/documents/NVDIMM_DriverWritersGuide-July-2016.pdf
> 
> defines the layout of the block window status register.  For the July 2016
> version of the spec linked to above, this happens in Figure 4 on page 26.
> 
> The only bits defined in this spec are bits 31, 5, 4, 2, 1 and 0.  The rest
> of the bits in the status register are reserved, and there is a warning
> following the diagram that says:
> 
>   Note: The driver cannot assume the value of the RESERVED bits in the
>   status register are zero. These reserved bits need to be masked off, and
>   the driver must avoid checking the state of those bits.
> 
> This change ensures that for hardware implementations that set these
> reserved bits in the status register, the driver won't incorrectly fail the
> block I/Os.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.2+

Ping on this patch - through which tree should we merge this for v4.8-rc2?
Dan's nvdimm tree?

> ---
> 
> Changes from V1:
>  - Rebased onto the v4.8 merge tree.  As Joey points out the ND BLK code
>    recently moved from drivers/acpi/nfit.c to drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c.
>    Since we were in the merge window for v4.8 I didn't know what to use as
>    a baseline, so I just used v4.7, which was apparently incorrect.  Sorry
>    about that.
> 
>  - Added Joey's reviewed-by.
> 
> For stable kernels v4.2 and beyond the v1 patch for drivers/acpi/nfit.c
> applies cleanly and should be used.
> 
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
> index 8c234dd..80cc7c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
> @@ -1527,11 +1527,12 @@ static u32 read_blk_stat(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw)
>  {
>  	struct nfit_blk_mmio *mmio = &nfit_blk->mmio[DCR];
>  	u64 offset = nfit_blk->stat_offset + mmio->size * bw;
> +	const u32 STATUS_MASK = 0x80000037;
>  
>  	if (mmio->num_lines)
>  		offset = to_interleave_offset(offset, mmio);
>  
> -	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset);
> +	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset) & STATUS_MASK;
>  }
>  
>  static void write_blk_ctl(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw,
> -- 
> 2.9.0
> 
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

Re: [PATCH v2] libnvdimm, nd_blk: mask off reserved status bits

[Dan Williams]

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Ross Zwisler
<ross.zwisler-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 12:26:53PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
>> The "NVDIMM Block Window Driver Writer's Guide":
>>
>> http://pmem.io/documents/
>> http://pmem.io/documents/NVDIMM_DriverWritersGuide-July-2016.pdf
>>
>> defines the layout of the block window status register.  For the July 2016
>> version of the spec linked to above, this happens in Figure 4 on page 26.
>>
>> The only bits defined in this spec are bits 31, 5, 4, 2, 1 and 0.  The rest
>> of the bits in the status register are reserved, and there is a warning
>> following the diagram that says:
>>
>>   Note: The driver cannot assume the value of the RESERVED bits in the
>>   status register are zero. These reserved bits need to be masked off, and
>>   the driver must avoid checking the state of those bits.
>>
>> This change ensures that for hardware implementations that set these
>> reserved bits in the status register, the driver won't incorrectly fail the
>> block I/Os.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
>> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>> Cc: stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org # v4.2+
>
> Ping on this patch - through which tree should we merge this for v4.8-rc2?
> Dan's nvdimm tree?

It's getting 0-day coverage on my libnvdimm-pending branch and will go
to Linus at the end of the week.

Re: [PATCH v2] libnvdimm, nd_blk: mask off reserved status bits

[Dan Williams]

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Ross Zwisler
<ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 12:26:53PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
>> The "NVDIMM Block Window Driver Writer's Guide":
>>
>> http://pmem.io/documents/
>> http://pmem.io/documents/NVDIMM_DriverWritersGuide-July-2016.pdf
>>
>> defines the layout of the block window status register.  For the July 2016
>> version of the spec linked to above, this happens in Figure 4 on page 26.
>>
>> The only bits defined in this spec are bits 31, 5, 4, 2, 1 and 0.  The rest
>> of the bits in the status register are reserved, and there is a warning
>> following the diagram that says:
>>
>>   Note: The driver cannot assume the value of the RESERVED bits in the
>>   status register are zero. These reserved bits need to be masked off, and
>>   the driver must avoid checking the state of those bits.
>>
>> This change ensures that for hardware implementations that set these
>> reserved bits in the status register, the driver won't incorrectly fail the
>> block I/Os.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com>
>> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.2+
>
> Ping on this patch - through which tree should we merge this for v4.8-rc2?
> Dan's nvdimm tree?

It's getting 0-day coverage on my libnvdimm-pending branch and will go
to Linus at the end of the week.

Re: [PATCH v2] libnvdimm, nd_blk: mask off reserved status bits

[Dan Williams]

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Ross Zwisler
<ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 12:26:53PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
>> The "NVDIMM Block Window Driver Writer's Guide":
>>
>> http://pmem.io/documents/
>> http://pmem.io/documents/NVDIMM_DriverWritersGuide-July-2016.pdf
>>
>> defines the layout of the block window status register.  For the July 2016
>> version of the spec linked to above, this happens in Figure 4 on page 26.
>>
>> The only bits defined in this spec are bits 31, 5, 4, 2, 1 and 0.  The rest
>> of the bits in the status register are reserved, and there is a warning
>> following the diagram that says:
>>
>>   Note: The driver cannot assume the value of the RESERVED bits in the
>>   status register are zero. These reserved bits need to be masked off, and
>>   the driver must avoid checking the state of those bits.
>>
>> This change ensures that for hardware implementations that set these
>> reserved bits in the status register, the driver won't incorrectly fail the
>> block I/Os.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com>
>> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.2+
>
> Ping on this patch - through which tree should we merge this for v4.8-rc2?
> Dan's nvdimm tree?

It's getting 0-day coverage on my libnvdimm-pending branch and will go
to Linus at the end of the week.

Re: [PATCH v2] libnvdimm, nd_blk: mask off reserved status bits

[Dan Williams]

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Ross Zwisler
<ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 12:26:53PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
>> The "NVDIMM Block Window Driver Writer's Guide":
>>
>> http://pmem.io/documents/
>> http://pmem.io/documents/NVDIMM_DriverWritersGuide-July-2016.pdf
>>
>> defines the layout of the block window status register.  For the July 2016
>> version of the spec linked to above, this happens in Figure 4 on page 26.
>>
>> The only bits defined in this spec are bits 31, 5, 4, 2, 1 and 0.  The rest
>> of the bits in the status register are reserved, and there is a warning
>> following the diagram that says:
>>
>>   Note: The driver cannot assume the value of the RESERVED bits in the
>>   status register are zero. These reserved bits need to be masked off, and
>>   the driver must avoid checking the state of those bits.
>>
>> This change ensures that for hardware implementations that set these
>> reserved bits in the status register, the driver won't incorrectly fail the
>> block I/Os.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com>
>> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.2+
>
> Ping on this patch - through which tree should we merge this for v4.8-rc2?
> Dan's nvdimm tree?

It's getting 0-day coverage on my libnvdimm-pending branch and will go
to Linus at the end of the week.
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

Re: [PATCH v2] libnvdimm, nd_blk: mask off reserved status bits

[Ross Zwisler]

On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 12:26:53PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> The "NVDIMM Block Window Driver Writer's Guide":
> 
> http://pmem.io/documents/
> http://pmem.io/documents/NVDIMM_DriverWritersGuide-July-2016.pdf
> 
> defines the layout of the block window status register.  For the July 2016
> version of the spec linked to above, this happens in Figure 4 on page 26.
> 
> The only bits defined in this spec are bits 31, 5, 4, 2, 1 and 0.  The rest
> of the bits in the status register are reserved, and there is a warning
> following the diagram that says:
> 
>   Note: The driver cannot assume the value of the RESERVED bits in the
>   status register are zero. These reserved bits need to be masked off, and
>   the driver must avoid checking the state of those bits.
> 
> This change ensures that for hardware implementations that set these
> reserved bits in the status register, the driver won't incorrectly fail the
> block I/Os.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.2+

Sorry, I neglected to add <> braces around the stable@vger.kernel.org
address, so git-send-email mangled the address.

Can you pick up this patch for stable kernels v4.2 and beyond?

Thanks,
- Ross

> ---
> 
> Changes from V1:
>  - Rebased onto the v4.8 merge tree.  As Joey points out the ND BLK code
>    recently moved from drivers/acpi/nfit.c to drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c.
>    Since we were in the merge window for v4.8 I didn't know what to use as
>    a baseline, so I just used v4.7, which was apparently incorrect.  Sorry
>    about that.
> 
>  - Added Joey's reviewed-by.
> 
> For stable kernels v4.2 and beyond the v1 patch for drivers/acpi/nfit.c
> applies cleanly and should be used.
> 
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
> index 8c234dd..80cc7c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
> @@ -1527,11 +1527,12 @@ static u32 read_blk_stat(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw)
>  {
>  	struct nfit_blk_mmio *mmio = &nfit_blk->mmio[DCR];
>  	u64 offset = nfit_blk->stat_offset + mmio->size * bw;
> +	const u32 STATUS_MASK = 0x80000037;
>  
>  	if (mmio->num_lines)
>  		offset = to_interleave_offset(offset, mmio);
>  
> -	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset);
> +	return readl(mmio->addr.base + offset) & STATUS_MASK;
>  }
>  
>  static void write_blk_ctl(struct nfit_blk *nfit_blk, unsigned int bw,
> -- 
> 2.9.0
>