From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51235) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXJ50-00077D-CR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 22:17:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXJ4x-00044T-2c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 22:17:14 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38966) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXJ4w-00044N-TD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 22:17:10 -0400 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 231C783F41 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 02:17:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:10:08 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20160810021008.GG11351@al.usersys.redhat.com> References: <1470757664-25161-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1470757664-25161-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] checkpatch tweaks List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, thuth@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, berrange@redhat.com On Tue, 08/09 17:47, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > My proposal after having watched patchew complain for a couple days > about patches being sent on the list. Looks good to me, I think patchew will just work as you want (be silent with long line warnings) once these are merged. Fam