All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Salah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com>
To: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@osg.samsung.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] befs: return BEFS_ERR if validation of ag_shift fails
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 08:53:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160816075303.GD3889@pc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57ADAC52.2050900@osg.samsung.com>

On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 12:00:34PM +0100, Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
> On 12/08/16 11:12, Salah Triki wrote:
> > ag_shift is used by blockno2iaddr() to get allocation group number
> > from block. If ag_shift is inconsistent with block_per_ag, an out of
> > bounds allocation group may occur [1]. So add return BEFS_ERR and update
> > comment and error message to reflect this change.
> > 
> > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/12/42
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Salah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/befs/super.c | 9 ++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/befs/super.c b/fs/befs/super.c
> > index 7c50025..2e3a3fd 100644
> > --- a/fs/befs/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/befs/super.c
> > @@ -101,10 +101,13 @@ befs_check_sb(struct super_block *sb)
> >  
> >  
> >  	/* ag_shift also encodes the same information as blocks_per_ag in a
> > -	 * different way, non-fatal consistency check
> > +	 * different way as a consistency check.
> >  	 */
> > -	if ((1 << befs_sb->ag_shift) != befs_sb->blocks_per_ag)
> > -		befs_error(sb, "ag_shift disagrees with blocks_per_ag.");
> > +	if ((1 << befs_sb->ag_shift) != befs_sb->blocks_per_ag) {
> > +		befs_error(sb, "ag_shift disagrees with blocks_per_ag. "
> > +			   "Corruption likely.");
> > +		return BEFS_ERR;
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	if (befs_sb->log_start != befs_sb->log_end ||
> >  	    befs_sb->flags == BEFS_DIRTY) {
> > 
> 
> Hi Salah,
> 
> I initially also added the BEFS_ERR return for this check. I understand
> it makes sense.
> 
> But as I mentioned in the patch adding this warning [0], a correct
> blocks_per_ag isn't mandatory. I noticed this because BeFS images
> created by Haiku OS just set blocks_per_ag to 1. Which is clearly not
> what it should be.
> 
> The file systems created by Haiku OS can be read without issues since
> sb->blocks_per_ag isn't actually used in lookups/reading file datastreams.
> 
> This is what I get in dmesg when loading a Haiku OS image with
> CONFIG_BEFS_DEBUG on:
> ...
> [  196.376651] befs: (loop1):   blocks_per_ag 1
> [  196.376652] befs: (loop1):   ag_shift 14
> ...
> 
> With ag_shift of 14, blocks_per_ag should be 16,384.
> 
> If we return BEFS_ERR, the system will refuse to mount and users won't be
> able to read these Haiku OS images they could read before. Unfortunate that
> Haiku OS is not using blocks_per_ag properly, but users and avoiding
> regressions go first.
> 
> Which BeFS images are you using to test the befs code? Since all the ones
> I have are generated from Haiku OS, all of them have a bad blocks_per_ag.
> LOL
> 
> Maybe we should contact Haiku OS developers and ask them to write a correct
> blocks_per_ag. Though we should also support images created before they fix
> this.
> 
> Sorry you spent time on this when the issue is out of our control :(
> Nacked-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@osg.samsung.com>
> 
> Thanks,
> Luis
> 
> [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/9/816

Hi Luis,

>  but users and avoiding regressions go first.

Indeed, you are right to stress the importance of users and avoiding
regressions.

> Which BeFS images are you using to test the befs code? 

http://befs-driver.sourceforge.net/

> Maybe we should contact Haiku OS developers and ask them to write a correct
> blocks_per_ag. 

Yes, it is a good idea.

Thanks,
Salah

      reply	other threads:[~2016-08-16  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-12 10:12 [PATCH] befs: return BEFS_ERR if validation of ag_shift fails Salah Triki
2016-08-12 11:00 ` Luis de Bethencourt
2016-08-16  7:53   ` Salah Triki [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160816075303.GD3889@pc \
    --to=salah.triki@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luisbg@osg.samsung.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.