From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] cpufreq / sched: Rework of cpufreq_update_util() arguments
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:21:27 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160816095127.GF21099@ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6346523.ZooER3FGDH@vostro.rjw.lan>
On 12-08-16, 02:01, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There were some comments on the "cpufreq / sched: cpufreq_update_util() flags
> and iowait boosting" series I sent some time ago and I wanted to address them,
> but for this purpose I had to combine patches [1-2,4/7] from that series
> into one and make some changes on top of that.
>
> Then I thought it would be better to send that separately from the iowait
> boost part of that series, so here it goes.
>
> [1/2] Removes the util and max args from cpufreq_update_util() and governor
> callbacks and adds a flags argument instead of them. That argument
> is then used to handle RT and DL in schedutil and the utilization data
> are accessed by it directly (so it is non-modular now to avoid exporting
> the scheduler internals to modules).
> [2/2] Replaces the time argument of cpufreq_update_util() with an rq pointer
> which allows some simplifications to be made.
>
> There should be no changes in behavior as a result of this.
>
> The v2 is to address comments from Steve.
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-16 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-12 0:01 [PATCH v2 0/2] cpufreq / sched: Rework of cpufreq_update_util() arguments Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-12 0:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq / sched: Pass flags to cpufreq_update_util() Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-15 22:15 ` Steve Muckle
2016-08-19 13:26 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-08-20 1:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-20 15:40 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-08-22 17:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-24 4:53 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-08-12 0:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq / sched: Pass runqueue pointer " Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-15 22:16 ` Steve Muckle
2016-08-16 9:51 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2016-08-16 12:00 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] cpufreq / sched: Rework of cpufreq_update_util() arguments Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160816095127.GF21099@ubuntu \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=steve.muckle@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.