Re: Working with public-inbox.org [Was: [PATCH] rev-parse: respect core.hooksPath in --git-path]

[Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>]

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> writes:
> > * Should the public-inbox offer another link to patches 1-n, without
> >   the cover letter? Or should it add instructions:
> >
> >         If this is a patch series you can apply it locally as:
> >         curl <link> >tmpXXX
> >         git am tmpXXX && git am --skip && git am --continue

Currently for web users, I suggest:

	curl $URL >tmpXXX

	# open tmpXXXX and tag+copy to patchesXXX using MUA of choice:
	# (also seems to be what Jeff describes):
	mutt -f tmpXXX

	git am patchesXXXX

> I do not think it is sensible for "cover-letter" specific
> instructions.  However, I do not think it is unreasonable to either
> add another mbox.gz link or replace the behaviour of mbox.gz link so
> that you can grab a mbox that contains "this message and everything
> after it in the thread".  That way, I could open the first message,
> see something like this I found in your message:
> 
> >> Thread overview: 4+ messages in thread (expand / mbox.gz / Atom feed / [top])
> >> 2016-08-15 23:06 Jacob Keller [this message]
> >> 2016-08-15 23:07 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] diff.c: remove output_prefix_length field Jacob Keller
> >> 2016-08-15 23:07 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] graph: add support for --line-prefix on all graph-aware output Jacob Keller
> >> 2016-08-15 23:07 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] diff: add SUBMODULE_DIFF format to display submodule diff Jacob Keller
> 
> and then go to 1/3 and click that "this and everything that
> follows".

Adding more links might still fall down in cases where
fixup/squash patches are sent for specific patches in a series;
or when a v{N+1} series is posted in-reply-to an existing
series.

Perhaps adding checkbox next to each item might work as a
select-to-include-in-mbox download form.  However, I'm already
finding the lack of horizontal space disconcerting.

Maybe the YYYY-MM-DD could be shortened to YYYYMMDD.  It would
be closer to the date searching syntax used by mairix, as well
as the search enhancement I started working on earlier today:

  https://public-inbox.org/meta/20160816084926.29394-1-e@80x24.org/T/
  (still will deploy soonish)