From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: locking looks odd
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 23:03:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160816210322.GD4466@var.home> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1020 bytes --]
Hello,
We are having odd issues with libasound 1.1.2 which we didn't have with
libasound 1.1.1, more precisely
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833950
so I'm having a look at the locking API introduced in 1.1.2, and there
are some oddities:
- snd_pcm_new seems to initialize pcm->thread_safe to 0 by default, this
does not seem safe. The attached patch initializes it to 1, which
fixes the bug in our tests.
- snd_pcm_hw_open_fd forces it to 1, thus ignoring what snd_pcm_new set.
- one can find both __snd_pcm_lock and snd_pcm_lock functions, what is
the expected difference between them?
- __snd_pcm_lock takes locks when thread_safe >= 0, while snd_pcm_lock
takes locks when thread_safe == 0, this looks really odd.
- libasound could just not link against libpthread,
pthread_mutex_lock/unlock are already provided as empty stubs by libc,
the overhead will thus only be hit when the application links against
libpthread (libasound will then properly use pthread locks).
Samuel
[-- Attachment #2: patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 337 bytes --]
--- ./src/pcm/pcm.c.orig 2016-08-10 19:39:59.881564371 +0200
+++ ./src/pcm/pcm.c 2016-08-10 19:40:04.211539997 +0200
@@ -2544,6 +2544,7 @@
pcm->fast_op_arg = pcm;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pcm->async_handlers);
#ifdef THREAD_SAFE_API
+ pcm->thread_safe = 1;
pthread_mutex_init(&pcm->lock, NULL);
{
static int default_thread_safe = -1;
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2016-08-16 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-16 21:03 Samuel Thibault [this message]
2016-08-17 12:41 ` locking looks odd Takashi Sakamoto
2016-08-17 17:46 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2016-08-20 12:12 ` Samuel Thibault
2016-08-22 12:02 ` Takashi Iwai
2016-08-26 19:02 ` Samuel Thibault
2016-08-30 14:20 ` Takashi Iwai
2016-08-30 15:54 ` Alan Horstmann
2016-08-30 16:00 ` Takashi Iwai
2016-08-22 11:54 ` Takashi Iwai
2016-09-01 6:27 ` David Henningsson
2016-09-01 8:12 ` Takashi Iwai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160816210322.GD4466@var.home \
--to=samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.