From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58374)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peterx@redhat.com>) id 1bZvQS-0007lN-IQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 03:38:13 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peterx@redhat.com>) id 1bZvQM-0004bM-IG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 03:38:11 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37576)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peterx@redhat.com>) id 1bZvQM-0004bH-Cu
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 03:38:06 -0400
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 15:38:02 +0800
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20160817073802.GG14217@pxdev.xzpeter.org>
References: <1470901038-9409-1-git-send-email-peterx@redhat.com>
	<1470901038-9409-2-git-send-email-peterx@redhat.com>
	<87eg5p6kk0.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
	<20160816115351.GB27853@al.usersys.redhat.com>
	<20160816121708.GD9866@pxdev.xzpeter.org>
	<20160816121908.GA28518@al.usersys.redhat.com>
	<20160816140018.GG9866@pxdev.xzpeter.org>
	<87zioc22o6.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
	<20160817064726.GB14217@pxdev.xzpeter.org>
	<87ziobsvce.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87ziobsvce.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] error-report: provide
 error_report_exit()
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 09:33:37AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > Yes I see usages for error_setg(&error_abort, ...), it makes sense to
> > provide error_report_abort() along with error_report_fatal(). Will
> > take your (and Fam's) advice.
> 
> Recommend to make it a separate patch.

Will do.

-- peterx