All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
	libc-alpha@sourceware.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>,
	Yuriy Kolerov <Yuriy.Kolerov@synopsys.com>
Subject: Re: [glibc PATCH] fcntl: put F_OFD_* constants under #ifdef __USE_FILE_OFFSET64
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 14:35:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160817213522.GG21655@vapier.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1471467478.3196.143.camel@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2185 bytes --]

On 17 Aug 2016 16:57, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 13:37 -0700, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 17 Aug 2016 16:05, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > 
> > > The way it works now is that when you define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 and
> > > call fcntl(fd, F_SETLK, fl) glibc swaps in a struct flock64 for your
> > > struct flock, and F_SETLK64 for the F_SETLK.
> > 
> > does it ?  doesn't seem like it does to me.  here's glibc's fcntl.c:
> > 	io/fcntl.c - generic stub that sets ENOSYS
> > 	sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/fcntl.c - just calls syscall(fcntl)
> > 	sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/generic/wordsize-32/fcntl.c - just calls syscall(fcntl64)
> > 	sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/fcntl.c - same as above
> > 	<all the other 32-bit arches include the i386 file>
> > 
> 
> Ok, I was being a little cavalier with my description. This is what
> really happens (from x86 struct flock definition):
> 
> struct flock
>   {
>     short int l_type;   /* Type of lock: F_RDLCK, F_WRLCK, or F_UNLCK.  */
>     short int l_whence; /* Where `l_start' is relative to (like `lseek').  */
> #ifndef __USE_FILE_OFFSET64
>     __off_t l_start;    /* Offset where the lock begins.  */
>     __off_t l_len;      /* Size of the locked area; zero means until EOF.  */
> #else
>     __off64_t l_start;  /* Offset where the lock begins.  */
>     __off64_t l_len;    /* Size of the locked area; zero means until EOF.  */
> #endif
>     __pid_t l_pid;      /* Process holding the lock.  */
>   };
> 
> So, l_start and l_len get redefined into larger sizes when LFS is
> enabled. The F_GETLK/F_SETLK/F_SETLKW are also redefined to their *64
> equivalents in that case using the preprocessor.

ah i forgot about that in the glibc header.  so it's not as grimm as
i was thinking, and explains how glibc has been providing the API so
the user doesn't have to explicitly pick the 64-bit types.

in order to do the same for OFD, we'd need to go the LFS route (i.e.
add fcntl64 and transparent rewrites in glibc).  or we can just run
with your idea ... i'm warmer to it now that i see we only have to
tell the user "enable LFS support" rather than "use the flock64
struct".
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-17 21:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-17 14:47 [glibc PATCH] fcntl: put F_OFD_* constants under #ifdef __USE_FILE_OFFSET64 Jeff Layton
2016-08-17 15:44 ` Joseph Myers
2016-08-17 17:49   ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-17 17:56     ` Joseph Myers
2016-08-17 18:23       ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-17 16:13 ` Mike Frysinger
2016-08-17 17:34 ` Florian Weimer
2016-08-17 17:39   ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-17 18:02     ` Florian Weimer
2016-08-17 18:21       ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-17 18:51         ` Florian Weimer
2016-08-17 19:20           ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-18  8:44             ` Florian Weimer
2016-08-18  8:58               ` Andreas Schwab
2016-08-17 20:52           ` Andreas Schwab
2016-08-18  8:45             ` Florian Weimer
2016-08-17 18:43 ` Mike Frysinger
2016-08-17 19:15   ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-17 19:59     ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-08-17 20:05       ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-17 20:37         ` Mike Frysinger
2016-08-17 20:57           ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-17 21:35             ` Mike Frysinger [this message]
2016-08-17 21:48               ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-18  9:00                 ` Florian Weimer
2016-08-23 11:03                   ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-08-23 11:36                     ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-23 11:38                       ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-08-23 21:10                         ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-11-14 13:45                           ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-11-22 18:41                             ` Florian Weimer
2016-08-18  8:57             ` Florian Weimer
2016-08-17 20:03     ` Mike Frysinger
2016-08-17 21:30       ` Cyril Hrubis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160817213522.GG21655@vapier.lan \
    --to=vapier@gentoo.org \
    --cc=Yuriy.Kolerov@synopsys.com \
    --cc=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.