All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Yauheni Kaliuta <yauheni.kaliuta@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Aristeu Rozanski <aris@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] rlimit exceed notification events
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:24:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160824112428.GA15743@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xunyh9ag254f.fsf@redhat.com>

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 05:41:20PM +0300, Yauheni Kaliuta wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> At the moment there is no clear indication if a process exceeds resource
> limit. In some cases the problematic syscall can return a error, in some cases
> the process can be just killed.
> 
> I'm trying to implement some sort of monitoring of such events and have a
> question, what way would be acceptable.

> 
> 1) The straight forward solution would be to instrument every such a place with
> a printk (something related implemented, for example, by
> d977d56ce5b3e8842236f2f9e7483d4914c9592e).
> 
> It has some concerns about reliablity and performance (giving a way to flood
> printk buffer because of bad application, for example).
> 
> 2) Using tracepoints. I've used a simple program, which dup()s until gets the
> error 3 times:

just to start up the discussion.. ;-)

I'd think this one (2) is the proper way, but generaly you need to
come with good justification/usecase to add new tracepoint

also rlimit seems to be difficult to add tracepoints to,
because the checks are spread all over the code.. 

can't think of a good solution ATM

> $ sudo ./perf record -e rlimit:rlimit_exceeded ./a.out
> Couldn't dup file: Too many open files, iteration 1020
> Couldn't dup file: Too many open files, iteration 1021
> Couldn't dup file: Too many open files, iteration 1022
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.010 MB perf.data (3 samples) ]
> 
> $ sudo ./perf report                                  
> # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options.
> #
> #
> # Total Lost Samples: 0
> #
> # Samples: 3  of event 'rlimit:rlimit_exceeded'
> # Event count (approx.): 3
> #
> # Overhead  Trace output                                            
> # ........  ........................................................
> #
>    100.00%  RLIMIT NOFILE violation. Current 1024, requested Unknown
> 
> The code to demonstrate the idea below:
> 
> diff --git a/fs/file.c b/fs/file.c
> index 6b1acdfe59da..a358de041ac4 100644
> --- a/fs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/file.c
> @@ -947,6 +947,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(dup, unsigned int, fildes)
>  		else
>  			fput(file);
>  	}
> +	if (ret == -EMFILE)
> +		rlimit_exceeded(RLIMIT_NOFILE,
> +				rlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE), (u64)-1);
>  	return ret;

how about other places? alloc_fd/get_unused_fd_flags/replace_fd..

jirka

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-24 11:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-19 14:41 [RFC] rlimit exceed notification events Yauheni Kaliuta
2016-08-24 11:24 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2016-08-25 10:07   ` Yauheni Kaliuta
2016-09-07 10:27   ` [PATCH RFC 0/2] " Yauheni Kaliuta
2016-09-07 10:27     ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] rlimits: add infra to report violations Yauheni Kaliuta
2016-09-07 10:27     ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] rlimits: report resource limits violations Yauheni Kaliuta
2016-09-07 21:20       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-09-08 13:09         ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-09-09  9:28     ` [PATCH RFC 0/2] rlimit exceed notification events Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160824112428.GA15743@krava \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=aris@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=yauheni.kaliuta@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.