From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, peterz@infradead.org, x86@kernel.org,
bp@suse.de, sudeep.holla@arm.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
alexey.klimov@arm.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lenb@kernel.org, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com,
jpoimboe@redhat.com, mcgrof@kernel.org, jgross@suse.com,
robert.moore@intel.com, dvyukov@google.com, jeyu@redhat.com,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] sched,x86: Enable Turbo Boost Max Technology
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:08:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160824180854.GA1398@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160824175057.GA5032@linux.intel.com>
* Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Ingo,
>
> This feature will be a clear benefit for client machines and
> less clear on servers.
>
> This feature is most beneficial to single threaded workload running on
> a single socket that operates in mostly Turbo mode. Client platform
> like Broadwell High End Desktop is the first one that supports it.
> Enablng this feature for such platform by default will be a win as it
> runs single threaded workload much of the time (10%-15% peformance
> upside).
>
> On the other hand, a heavily loaded server that rarely operates in Turbo
> mode will benefit much less from this feature. There is some overhead
> incurred by migrating load to the favored cores. Some server folks
> have asked us to be cautious here and not to turn on ITMT scheduling
> by default. Even so, when the server is lightly loaded, this feature
> can still be a win. That said, this is future looking as we don't have
> any server with this feature today.
>
> So if we take the approach to enable this feature by default for only
> single node system (using that as a criteria for client), will that seem
> reasonable to you?
I suppose that would work. Peter, any objections to such an approach?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-24 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-18 22:36 [PATCH 00/11] Support Intel® Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0 Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-08-18 22:36 ` [PATCH 01/11] sched, cpuset: Add regenerate_sched_domains function to rebuild all sched domains Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-08-22 13:52 ` Morten Rasmussen
2016-08-22 19:51 ` Tim Chen
2016-08-18 22:36 ` [PATCH 02/11] sched, x86: Add SD_ASYM_PACKING flags to x86 cpu topology for cpus supporting Intel Turbo Boost Max Technology Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-08-18 22:36 ` [PATCH 03/11] sched: Extend scheduler's asym packing Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-08-25 11:22 ` Morten Rasmussen
2016-08-25 11:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-25 13:18 ` Morten Rasmussen
2016-08-25 13:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-26 10:39 ` Morten Rasmussen
2016-08-26 12:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-26 17:25 ` Tim Chen
2016-08-26 23:14 ` Tim Chen
2016-08-18 22:36 ` [PATCH 04/11] sched,x86: Enable Turbo Boost Max Technology Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-08-22 9:01 ` kbuild test robot
2016-08-22 9:01 ` kbuild test robot
2016-08-22 19:04 ` Tim Chen
2016-08-24 10:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-08-24 17:50 ` Tim Chen
2016-08-24 18:08 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2016-08-24 18:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-18 22:36 ` [PATCH 05/11] acpi: cppc: Allow build with ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS config Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-08-20 0:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-18 22:36 ` [PATCH 06/11] acpi: cpcc: Add integer read support Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-08-18 22:36 ` [PATCH 07/11] acpi: cppc: Add support for function fixed hardware address Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-08-20 0:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-18 22:36 ` [PATCH 08/11] acpi: cppc: Add prefix cppc to cpudata structure name Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-08-18 22:36 ` [PATCH 09/11] acpi: bus: Enable HWP CPPC objects Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-08-20 0:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-18 22:36 ` [PATCH 10/11] acpi: bus: Set _OSC for diverse core support Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-08-20 0:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-18 22:36 ` [PATCH 11/11] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Use CPPC to get max performance Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-08-22 11:59 ` kbuild test robot
2016-08-22 11:59 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160824180854.GA1398@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexey.klimov@arm.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeyu@redhat.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.