Re: [WireGuard] wg set - unexpected change of routes

["Ivan Labáth" <labawi-wg@matrix-dream.net>]

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:44:39AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 07:44:54 +0100,
>   Ivan Labáth <labawi-wg@matrix-dream.net> wrote:
> >
> >I think repeating subnets in different peers is most probably
> >an error and in such circumstances the most useful action would
> >be to fail and report it as such.
> 
> Except in some cases it is convenient to use a large network for one peer 
> and carve out a small subnet in another. Having to list a big subnet with 
> a carve out as the sum of smaller networks can be a big pain.

By repeating subnets, I meant repeating ip/mask tuples.
It is something that wireguard already enforces, but it
does so by silently dropping all but the last occurence
of the ip+mask.


Currently it will even happily load the following configuration,
dropping the first occurence of the 10/24 subnet:

[Interface]
PrivateKey = mP3lDaGe7Ge/fo1k+TNnBlRVXiZKJSiWfwFrCdcaDGM=

[Peer]
PublicKey = iiLB93qP+YnDqxN4UixSpEWhvqWdZYmcs0fjKRShNmA=
AllowedIPs = 10.0.0.0/16

[Peer]
PublicKey = qAoLCCM/K3JWqaaSdOy2SmuzMTRwTaxyRR3g36tdzgY=
AllowedIPs = 10.0.0.0/16



The following is valid, correctly loaded, as should remain so
(I don't know whether it routes among peers)

[Interface]
PrivateKey = mP3lDaGe7Ge/fo1k+TNnBlRVXiZKJSiWfwFrCdcaDGM=

[Peer]
PublicKey = iiLB93qP+YnDqxN4UixSpEWhvqWdZYmcs0fjKRShNmA=
AllowedIPs = 10.0.0.0/16

[Peer]
PublicKey = qAoLCCM/K3JWqaaSdOy2SmuzMTRwTaxyRR3g36tdzgY=
AllowedIPs = 10.0.0.0/24


I am concerned about situations where one would issue commands
that reuse a route and would not know that a route was removed
from a peer. For example, with the last configuration:

wg set wg0 peer qAoLCCM/K3JWqaaSdOy2SmuzMTRwTaxyRR3g36tdzgY= allowed-ips 10.0.0.0/16
wg set wg0 peer qAoLCCM/K3JWqaaSdOy2SmuzMTRwTaxyRR3g36tdzgY= allowed-ips 10.0.0.0/24

One might think he restored the configuration, but the /16 route was
removed from the first peer.