From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S934976AbcHaOBe (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 31 Aug 2016 10:01:34 -0400
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:38990 "EHLO
        mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S934044AbcHaOBa (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 31 Aug 2016 10:01:30 -0400
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 16:01:38 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>, yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com,
        alan@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 RESEND] tty/n_gsm.c: use gsm->num to remove mux itself
 from gsm_mux[]
Message-ID: <20160831140138.GA13669@kroah.com>
References: <57874F5F.5050000@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <57874F5F.5050000@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 04:37:51PM +0800, xinhui wrote:
> From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> There is one filed gsm->num to store mux's index of gsm_mux[]. So use
> gsm->num to remove itself from gsm_mux[] instead of the for-loop
> traverse in gsm_cleanup_mux().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> change from V1:
> 	lock is also held for the if()
> ---
>  drivers/tty/n_gsm.c | 13 +++++--------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Doesn't apply to my tree :(