All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] dm path selector: Avoid that device removal triggers an infinite loop
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 11:26:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160901152641.GA65959@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bda2e9d3-69b9-671b-296b-3be7b5bc79cf@sandisk.com>

On Thu, Sep 01 2016 at 11:22P -0400,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com> wrote:

> On 09/01/2016 08:06 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 01 2016 at 10:14am -0400,
> >Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com> wrote:
> >
> >>On 08/31/16 20:29, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >>>On Wed, Aug 31 2016 at  6:18pm -0400,
> >>>Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>If pg_init_retries is set and a request is queued against a
> >>>>multipath device with all underlying block devices in the "dying"
> >>>>state then an infinite loop is triggered because activate_path()
> >>>>never succeeds and hence never calls pg_init_done(). Fix this by
> >>>>making ql_select_path() skip dying paths.
> >>>
> >>>Assuming DM multipath needs to be sprinkling these dying queue checks so
> >>>deep (which I'm not yet sold on):
> >>>
> >>>Same would be needed in service-time and round-robin right?
> >>
> >>Hello Mike,
> >>
> >>Before addressing service-time and round-robin path selectors I wanted
> >>to make sure that we reach agreement about how to fix the queue length
> >>path selector.
> >>
> >>Do you have a proposal for an alternative approach to fix the infinite
> >>loop that can be triggered during device removal?
> >
> >I'm going to look closer now.  But I'd prefer to see the "dying" state
> >check(s) elevated to DM multipath.  Really would rather the path
> >selectors not have to worry about this state.
> 
> Hello Mike,
> 
> How about making blk_cleanup_queue() invoke a callback function in dm or
> dm-mpath and to use that callback function to keep track of the number of
> paths that are not in the "dying" state? That would allow to detect in the
> dm or dm-mpath driver whether or not all paths are in the dying state
> without having to modify every path selector. This is just an idea - there
> might be better alternatives.

Even that seems like overkill.  What about this?  Any chance you could
try the linux-dm.git 'dm-4.9' branch with this patch ontop?

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
index ac734e5..15db5e9 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
@@ -1521,10 +1521,10 @@ static void activate_path(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct pgpath *pgpath =
 		container_of(work, struct pgpath, activate_path.work);
+	struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(pgpath->path.dev->bdev);
 
-	if (pgpath->is_active)
-		scsi_dh_activate(bdev_get_queue(pgpath->path.dev->bdev),
-				 pg_init_done, pgpath);
+	if (pgpath->is_active && !blk_queue_dying(q))
+		scsi_dh_activate(q, pg_init_done, pgpath);
 	else
 		pg_init_done(pgpath, SCSI_DH_DEV_OFFLINED);
 }

      reply	other threads:[~2016-09-01 15:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-31 22:14 [PATCH 0/9] dm patches for kernel v4.9 Bart Van Assche
2016-08-31 22:15 ` [PATCH 1/9] blk-mq: Introduce blk_mq_queue_stopped() Bart Van Assche
2016-08-31 22:16 ` [PATCH 2/9] dm: Rename a function argument Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01  3:29   ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 14:17     ` Bart Van Assche
2016-08-31 22:16 ` [PATCH 3/9] dm: Introduce signal_pending_state() Bart Van Assche
2016-08-31 22:16 ` [PATCH 4/9] dm: Convert wait loops Bart Van Assche
2016-08-31 22:17 ` [PATCH 5/9] dm: Add two lockdep_assert_held() statements Bart Van Assche
2016-08-31 22:17 ` [PATCH 6/9] dm: Simplify dm_old_stop_queue() Bart Van Assche
2016-08-31 22:17 ` [PATCH 7/9] dm: Mark block layer queue dead before destroying the dm device Bart Van Assche
2016-08-31 22:18 ` [PATCH 8/9] dm: Fix two race conditions related to stopping and starting queues Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01  3:13   ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 14:23     ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 15:05       ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 15:31         ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 15:50           ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 16:12             ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 17:59               ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 19:05                 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 19:35                   ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 20:15                   ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 20:33                     ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 20:39                       ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 20:48                         ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 20:52                           ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 21:17                             ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 22:18                               ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 22:22                                 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 22:26                                   ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 23:17                                     ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 23:47                                       ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-02  0:03                                         ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-02 15:12                                           ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-02 16:10                                             ` should blk-mq halt requeue processing while queue is frozen? [was: Re: [PATCH 8/9] dm: Fix two race conditions related to stopping and starting queues] Mike Snitzer
2016-09-02 22:42                                               ` [dm-devel] should blk-mq halt requeue processing while queue is frozen? Bart Van Assche
2016-09-02 22:42                                                 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-03  0:34                                                 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-07 16:41                                                 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-13  8:01                                                   ` [dm-devel] " Bart Van Assche
2016-09-13 14:36                                                     ` Mike Snitzer
2016-08-31 22:18 ` [PATCH 9/9] dm path selector: Avoid that device removal triggers an infinite loop Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01  2:49   ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 14:14     ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 15:06       ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 15:22         ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 15:26           ` Mike Snitzer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160901152641.GA65959@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.