From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Cc: "axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] dm: Fix two race conditions related to stopping and starting queues
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:12:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160901161253.GA11410@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160901155051.GA11353@redhat.com>
On Thu, Sep 01 2016 at 11:50am -0400,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01 2016 at 11:31am -0400,
> Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com> wrote:
>
> > On 09/01/2016 08:05 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > >I've staged most of your changes (with slight tweaks), see:
> > >https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/log/?h=dm-4.9
> > >
> > >Only remaining issue is the queue dying race(s) in dm-multipath.
> >
> > Thanks Mike! Two minor comments though:
> > * In dm_start_queue(), I think that the queue_flag_clear_unlocked()
> > call should be converted into queue_flag_clear() and that it should
> > be protected by the block layer queue lock. Every call of
> > queue_flag_clear_unlocked() after block device initialization has
> > finished is wrong if blk_cleanup_queue() can be called concurrently.
>
> OK, I'll have a look.
Please see/test the dm-4.8 and dm-4.9 branches (dm-4.9 being rebased
ontop of dm-4.8):
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/log/?h=dm-4.8
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/log/?h=dm-4.9
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-01 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-31 22:14 [PATCH 0/9] dm patches for kernel v4.9 Bart Van Assche
2016-08-31 22:15 ` [PATCH 1/9] blk-mq: Introduce blk_mq_queue_stopped() Bart Van Assche
2016-08-31 22:16 ` [PATCH 2/9] dm: Rename a function argument Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 3:29 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 14:17 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-08-31 22:16 ` [PATCH 3/9] dm: Introduce signal_pending_state() Bart Van Assche
2016-08-31 22:16 ` [PATCH 4/9] dm: Convert wait loops Bart Van Assche
2016-08-31 22:17 ` [PATCH 5/9] dm: Add two lockdep_assert_held() statements Bart Van Assche
2016-08-31 22:17 ` [PATCH 6/9] dm: Simplify dm_old_stop_queue() Bart Van Assche
2016-08-31 22:17 ` [PATCH 7/9] dm: Mark block layer queue dead before destroying the dm device Bart Van Assche
2016-08-31 22:18 ` [PATCH 8/9] dm: Fix two race conditions related to stopping and starting queues Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 3:13 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 14:23 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 15:05 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 15:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 15:50 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 16:12 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2016-09-01 17:59 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 19:05 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 19:35 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 20:15 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 20:33 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 20:39 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 20:48 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 20:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 21:17 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 22:18 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 22:22 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 22:26 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 23:17 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 23:47 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-02 0:03 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-02 15:12 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-02 16:10 ` should blk-mq halt requeue processing while queue is frozen? [was: Re: [PATCH 8/9] dm: Fix two race conditions related to stopping and starting queues] Mike Snitzer
2016-09-02 22:42 ` [dm-devel] should blk-mq halt requeue processing while queue is frozen? Bart Van Assche
2016-09-02 22:42 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-03 0:34 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-07 16:41 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-13 8:01 ` [dm-devel] " Bart Van Assche
2016-09-13 14:36 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-08-31 22:18 ` [PATCH 9/9] dm path selector: Avoid that device removal triggers an infinite loop Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 2:49 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 14:14 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 15:06 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 15:22 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 15:26 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160901161253.GA11410@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.