From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752731AbcIBNVB (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Sep 2016 09:21:01 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:51800 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751297AbcIBNU7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Sep 2016 09:20:59 -0400 Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 15:20:45 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Ingo Molnar , Al Viro , Bart Van Assche , Johannes Weiner , Linus Torvalds , Neil Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched/wait: avoid abort_exclusive_wait() in __wait_on_bit_lock() Message-ID: <20160902132045.GG10153@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20160826124453.GA28894@redhat.com> <20160826124552.GB28904@redhat.com> <20160901190141.GJ10138@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20160901221743.GJ10168@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20160902120642.GC26495@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160902120642.GC26495@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 02:06:43PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > Yes, I considered this option, but to me the addtional finish_wait() > looks simpler. its all relative, this stuff always makes my head hurt one way or the other ;-) > And, if you agree with this change I will try to change __wait_event() > as well and kill abort_exclusive_wait(). Yeah, I think this'll work. Please send a new series with 'enhanced' changelog so that when we have to look at this again in a few weeks/months time we won't be cursing at ourselves for how the heck it was supposed to work.