diff for duplicates of <20160906143928.GA25201@localhost.localdomain> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index eefd476..9d1f7d3 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 09:48:00PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: -> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 10:24:10AM -0400, Keith Busch wrote: -> > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 10:46:24AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: -> > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:38:53PM -0400, Keith Busch wrote: +On Mon, Sep 05, 2016@09:48:00PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: +> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016@10:24:10AM -0400, Keith Busch wrote: +> > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016@10:46:24AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: +> > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016@12:38:53PM -0400, Keith Busch wrote: > > > > This can't be right. We have a single affinity mask for the entire > > > > set, but what I think we want is an one affinity mask for each > > > > nr_io_queues. The irq_create_affinity_mask should then create an array diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 4875701..1854313 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -4,19 +4,15 @@ "ref\020160901084624.GC4115@lst.de\0" "ref\020160901142410.GA10903@localhost.localdomain\0" "ref\020160905194759.GA26008@lst.de\0" - "From\0Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 4/7] blk-mq: allow the driver to pass in an affinity mask\0" + "From\0keith.busch@intel.com (Keith Busch)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH 4/7] blk-mq: allow the driver to pass in an affinity mask\0" "Date\0Tue, 6 Sep 2016 10:39:28 -0400\0" - "To\0Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>\0" - "Cc\0axboe@fb.com" - linux-block@vger.kernel.org - " linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" - "On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 09:48:00PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:\n" - "> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 10:24:10AM -0400, Keith Busch wrote:\n" - "> > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 10:46:24AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:\n" - "> > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:38:53PM -0400, Keith Busch wrote:\n" + "On Mon, Sep 05, 2016@09:48:00PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:\n" + "> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016@10:24:10AM -0400, Keith Busch wrote:\n" + "> > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016@10:46:24AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:\n" + "> > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016@12:38:53PM -0400, Keith Busch wrote:\n" "> > > > This can't be right. We have a single affinity mask for the entire\n" "> > > > set, but what I think we want is an one affinity mask for each\n" "> > > > nr_io_queues. The irq_create_affinity_mask should then create an array\n" @@ -59,4 +55,4 @@ "17 pairs with 1, 18 with 2, and so on. You can't convey that information\n" with this scheme. We need affinity_masks per vector. -fd03b88e77fcac84d655f49e87d616242fbecd135d4ed69e55c0556836f42b3a +1110bac71da50c4a50ac06e51f077729966d0b8147fb22c8093be3795ca3a2d8
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.