From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 14:06:21 -0400 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 07/44] Use separate options for TPL support In-Reply-To: <1472516512-26412-8-git-send-email-sjg@chromium.org> References: <1472516512-26412-1-git-send-email-sjg@chromium.org> <1472516512-26412-8-git-send-email-sjg@chromium.org> Message-ID: <20160906180621.GA4990@bill-the-cat> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 06:21:15PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > At present TPL uses the same options as SPL support. In a few cases the board > config enables or disables the SPL options depending on whether > CONFIG_TPL_BUILD is defined. > > With the move to Kconfig, options are determined for the whole build and > (without a hack like an #undef in a header file) cannot be controlled in this > way. > > Create new TPL options for these and update users. This will allow Kconfig > conversion to proceed for these boards. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass For the record, I think this shows that we need to think about how we setup and build SPL/TPL/... but I also think we can't fix it until we've unwound what we have now so it's clear what is and isn't used, what is and isn't a pain about it and how at the end of the day users also need to build something, something that works and ideally not spend more time doing all of that than it takes to actually just build what they want. -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: