All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
To: "Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/14] drm/i915/dp: Add a standalone function to obtain shared dpll for HSW/BDW/SKL/BXT
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 15:08:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160907220821.GA28560@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1472847689.1219.22.camel@dk-H97M-D3H>

On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 01:06:32PM -0700, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-09-01 at 15:08 -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > From: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > Add the PLL selection code for HSW/BDW/BXT/SKL into a stand-alone function
> > in order to allow for the implementation of a platform neutral upfront
> > link training function.
> > 
> > v3:
> > * Add Hooks for all DDI platforms into this standalone function
> > 
> > v2:
> > * Change the macro to use dev_priv instead of dev (David Weinehall)
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c      | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h |  2 ++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h      |  3 ++-
> >  4 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > index e4b875e..67a6a0b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > @@ -2393,6 +2393,44 @@ intel_ddi_init_hdmi_connector(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port)
> >  	return connector;
> >  }
> >  
> > +struct intel_shared_dpll *
> > +intel_ddi_get_link_dpll(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int clock)
> > +{
> > +	struct intel_connector *connector = intel_dp->attached_connector;
> > +	struct intel_encoder *encoder = connector->encoder;
> > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
> > +	struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> > +	struct intel_shared_dpll *pll = NULL;
> > +	struct intel_shared_dpll_config tmp_pll_config;
> > +	enum intel_dpll_id dpll_id;
> > +
> > +	if (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv)) {
> > +		dpll_id =  (enum intel_dpll_id)dig_port->port;
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Select the required PLL. This works for platforms where
> > +		 * there is no shared DPLL.
> > +		 */
> > +		pll = &dev_priv->shared_dplls[dpll_id];
> > +		if (WARN_ON(pll->active_mask)) {
> > +
> > +			DRM_ERROR("Shared DPLL in use. active_mask:%x\n",
> > +				  pll->active_mask);
> > +			pll = NULL;
> > +		}
> > +		tmp_pll_config = pll->config;
> 
> NULL dereference when pll is in use? 

Yes I had given this comment in the internal review. So we moved this assignment out 
to the calling function, but left this here as well. I will remove this and resubmit.

Manasi
> 
> > +		if (!bxt_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(clock,
> > +						  &pll->config.hw_state)) {
> > +			DRM_ERROR("Could not setup DPLL\n");
> > +			pll->config = tmp_pll_config;
> > +		}
> > +	} else if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv)) {
> > +		pll = skl_find_link_pll(dev_priv, clock);
> > +	} else if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv)) {
> > +		pll = hsw_ddi_dp_get_dpll(encoder, clock);
> > +	}
> > +	return pll;
> > +}
> > +
> >  void intel_ddi_init(struct drm_device *dev, enum port port)
> >  {
> >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > index 9a1da98..4b067ac 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > @@ -24,6 +24,44 @@
> >  #include "intel_drv.h"
> >  
> >  struct intel_shared_dpll *
> > +skl_find_link_pll(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int clock)
> > +{
> > +	struct intel_shared_dpll *pll = NULL;
> > +	struct intel_dpll_hw_state dpll_hw_state;
> > +	enum intel_dpll_id i;
> > +	bool found = false;
> > +
> > +	if (!skl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(clock, &dpll_hw_state))
> > +		return pll;
> > +
> > +	for (i = DPLL_ID_SKL_DPLL1; i <= DPLL_ID_SKL_DPLL3; i++) {
> > +		pll = &dev_priv->shared_dplls[i];
> > +
> > +		/* Only want to check enabled timings first */
> > +		if (pll->config.crtc_mask == 0)
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		if (memcmp(&dpll_hw_state, &pll->config.hw_state,
> > +			   sizeof(pll->config.hw_state)) == 0) {
> > +			found = true;
> > +			break;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* Ok no matching timings, maybe there's a free one? */
> > +	for (i = DPLL_ID_SKL_DPLL1;
> > +	     ((found == false) && (i <= DPLL_ID_SKL_DPLL3)); i++) {
> > +		pll = &dev_priv->shared_dplls[i];
> > +		if (pll->config.crtc_mask == 0) {
> > +			pll->config.hw_state = dpll_hw_state;
> > +			break;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return pll;
> > +}
> > +
> > +struct intel_shared_dpll *
> >  intel_get_shared_dpll_by_id(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  			    enum intel_dpll_id id)
> >  {
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> > index aed7408..f438535 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> > @@ -168,6 +168,8 @@ bool bxt_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
> >  /* SKL dpll related functions */
> >  bool skl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
> >  				  struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state);
> > +struct intel_shared_dpll *skl_find_link_pll(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > +					    int clock);
> >  
> > 
> >  /* HSW dpll related functions */
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > index 529fa7b..efcd80b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > @@ -1159,7 +1159,8 @@ void intel_ddi_clock_get(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> >  			 struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config);
> >  void intel_ddi_set_vc_payload_alloc(struct drm_crtc *crtc, bool state);
> >  uint32_t ddi_signal_levels(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> > -
> > +struct intel_shared_dpll *intel_ddi_get_link_dpll(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > +						  int clock);
> >  unsigned int intel_fb_align_height(struct drm_device *dev,
> >  				   unsigned int height,
> >  				   uint32_t pixel_format,
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-07 22:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-01 22:08 [PATCH 00/14] Enable Upfront Link Training on DDI platforms Manasi Navare
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] drm/i915: Don't pass crtc_state to intel_dp_set_link_params() Manasi Navare
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] drm/i915: Remove ddi_pll_sel from intel_crtc_state Manasi Navare
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] drm/i915: Split intel_ddi_pre_enable() into DP and HDMI versions Manasi Navare
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] drm/i915: Split bxt_ddi_pll_select() Manasi Navare
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915: Split skl_get_dpll() Manasi Navare
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH 06/14] drm/i915: Split hsw_get_dpll() Manasi Navare
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] drm/i915/dp: Add a standalone function to obtain shared dpll for HSW/BDW/SKL/BXT Manasi Navare
2016-09-02 20:06   ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2016-09-07 22:08     ` Manasi Navare [this message]
2016-09-07 22:47   ` [PATCH v4 7/14] " Manasi Navare
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH 08/14] drm/i915/dp: Move max. vswing check to it's own function Manasi Navare
2016-09-02  8:05   ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-06  9:58     ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-06 21:25       ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-07  0:13   ` [PATCH v2 8/14] " Manasi Navare
2016-09-07  7:00     ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-07 18:28     ` [PATCH v3 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-08  7:38       ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-13 11:44         ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH 09/14] drm/dp/i915: Make clock recovery in the link training compliant with DP Spec 1.2 Manasi Navare
2016-09-02  9:16   ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-02 17:55     ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2016-09-07  0:13   ` [PATCH v2 9/14] " Manasi Navare
2016-09-07  7:33     ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-07 18:28     ` [PATCH v3 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-08  8:20       ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915: Make DP link training channel equalization DP 1.2 Spec compliant Manasi Navare
2016-09-02 11:20   ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-02 19:05     ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2016-09-07  7:50       ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-13 16:09         ` Rodrigo Vivi
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915: Fallback to lower link rate and lane count during link training Manasi Navare
2016-09-02 12:03   ` David Weinehall
2016-09-06 17:34     ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-02 12:49   ` David Weinehall
2016-09-06 17:54     ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-02 13:00   ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-06 18:01     ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-02 19:52   ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2016-09-02 20:01     ` Jim Bride
2016-09-07  0:13   ` [PATCH v2 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-07  9:47     ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-07 16:47       ` Jim Bride
2016-09-07 16:48       ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-07 18:28     ` [PATCH v3 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-08  0:30       ` [PATCH v4 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-08  9:32         ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-09  1:05         ` Rodrigo Vivi
2016-09-09  7:11           ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-09  7:11         ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-09 17:13           ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-09 23:29         ` [PATCH v5 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm/i915: Reverse the loop in intel_dp_compute_config Manasi Navare
2016-09-02 13:08   ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-08 14:47     ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-02 20:24   ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2016-09-08 20:02   ` [PATCH v2 12/14] drm/i915: Remove the link rate and lane count loop in compute config Manasi Navare
2016-09-13  1:14     ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2016-09-14  1:05       ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH v11 13/14] drm/i915/dp: Enable Upfront link training for typeC DP support on HSW/BDW/SKL/BXT (DDI platforms) Manasi Navare
2016-09-07  0:13   ` [PATCH v12 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-07 18:28     ` [PATCH v13 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-08 12:10       ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-08 15:06         ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-08 17:22       ` [PATCH v14 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-08 20:02         ` [PATCH v15 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-09  7:34           ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-09 23:29           ` [PATCH 13-1/14] drm/i915: Change the placement of some static functions in intel_dp.c Manasi Navare
2016-09-12 23:21             ` Rodrigo Vivi
2016-09-09 23:29           ` [PATCH v16 13-2/14] drm/i915/dp: Enable Upfront link training on HSW/BDW/SKL/BXT Manasi Navare
2016-09-13  0:22             ` Rodrigo Vivi
2016-09-09  7:31         ` [PATCH v14 13/14] drm/i915/dp: Enable Upfront link training for typeC DP support on HSW/BDW/SKL/BXT (DDI platforms) Jani Nikula
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915/dp/mst: Add support for upfront link training for DP MST Manasi Navare
2016-09-07  0:13   ` [PATCH v2 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-07 10:53     ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-07 16:40       ` Jim Bride
2016-09-08 10:21         ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-08 11:50       ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-01 22:48 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Enable upfront link training on DDI platforms (rev3) Patchwork
2016-09-07  0:54 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for Enable upfront link training on DDI platforms (rev8) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160907220821.GA28560@intel.com \
    --to=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
    --cc=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.