From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
serebrin@google.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v6] x86,mm,sched: make lazy TLB mode even lazier
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 08:56:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160908065606.GB25876@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160831122710.5285c4ca@annuminas.surriel.com>
* Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Aug 2016 16:02:25 -0700
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > Yeah, with those small fixes from Ingo, I definitely don't think this
> > looks hacky at all. This all seems to be exactly what we should always
> > have done.
>
> OK, so I was too tired yesterday to do kernel hacking, and
> missed yet another bit (xen_flush_tlb_others). Sigh.
>
> Otherwise, the patch is identical.
>
> Looking forward to Ben's test results.
Gentle ping to Ben.
I can also apply this without waiting for the test result, the patch looks sane
enough to me.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-08 6:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-25 19:04 [PATCH RFC UGLY] x86,mm,sched: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel
2016-08-25 19:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-08-25 19:52 ` Rik van Riel
2016-08-25 20:15 ` [PATCH RFC v2] " Rik van Riel
2016-08-25 21:01 ` [PATCH RFC v3] " Rik van Riel
2016-08-27 8:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-08-27 23:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-08-30 19:53 ` [PATCH RFC v4] " Rik van Riel
2016-08-30 21:09 ` [PATCH RFC v5] " Rik van Riel
2016-08-31 16:27 ` [PATCH RFC v6] " Rik van Riel
2016-09-08 6:56 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2016-09-09 0:09 ` Benjamin Serebrin
2016-09-09 4:39 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-09-09 7:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-25 3:30 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-29 15:24 ` [PATCH RFC v3] " Rik van Riel
2016-08-29 16:08 ` [PATCH RFC UGLY] " Rik van Riel
2016-08-28 8:11 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-29 14:54 ` Rik van Riel
2016-08-29 23:55 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-30 1:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-08-30 18:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160908065606.GB25876@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=serebrin@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.