From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com ([74.125.82.68]:33628 "EHLO mail-wm0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S938732AbcIHIfo (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Sep 2016 04:35:44 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f68.google.com with SMTP id b187so2712826wme.0 for ; Thu, 08 Sep 2016 01:35:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 10:35:37 +0200 From: Ralph Sennhauser Subject: Re: [BUG] xfsprogs-4.7.0: issues cross-compiling for musl Message-ID: <20160908103537.13c1c7dc@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20160907222753.GR30056@dastard> References: <1473241376-10922-1-git-send-email-ralph.sennhauser@gmail.com> <20160907222753.GR30056@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: Dave Chinner Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Eric Sandeen Hi Dave, will answer to 1-3 via Erics mail On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 08:27:53 +1000 Dave Chinner wrote: > On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 11:42:56AM +0200, Ralph Sennhauser wrote: > > 4) sys/ustat.h is missing in musl. > > Yup, been reported before. I'm about to commit a fix for that, > mainly because certain new arches don't even implement the ustat > system call, and glibc completely fucks up the handling of that. > i.e. programs that call ustat don't fail at build time, the syscall > is stubbed to print "not supported, will fail" at runtime. Hence > nobody noticed that the xfsprogs code calling ustat was actually > broken until a week ago... > > Cheers, > > Dave. So this one I can consider taken care of, very nice! Thanks Ralph