All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
Cc: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, ohad@wizery.com,
	linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel@stlinux.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] remoteproc: core: add rproc ops for memory allocation
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 15:06:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160908140610.GT4921@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1473147584-13183-4-git-send-email-loic.pallardy@st.com>

On Tue, 06 Sep 2016, Loic Pallardy wrote:

> Remoteproc core is currently using dma_alloc_coherent for
> carveout and vring allocation.
> It doesn't allow to support specific use cases like fixed memory
> region or internal RAM support.
> 
> Two new rproc ops (alloc and free) is added to provide flexibility
> to platform implementation to provide specific memory allocator
> taking into account coprocessor characteristics.
> rproc_handle_carveout and rproc_alloc_vring functions are modified
> to invoke these ops if present, and fallback to regular processing
> if platform specific allocation failed and if resquested memory is
> not fixed (physical address == FW_RSC_ADDR_ANY)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  include/linux/remoteproc.h           |  4 +++
>  2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 0d3c191..7493b08 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -207,19 +207,29 @@ int rproc_alloc_vring(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int i)
>  	struct rproc_vring *rvring = &rvdev->vring[i];
>  	struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc;
>  	dma_addr_t dma;
> -	void *va;
> +	void *va = NULL;
>  	int ret, size, notifyid;
>  
>  	/* actual size of vring (in bytes) */
>  	size = PAGE_ALIGN(vring_size(rvring->len, rvring->align));
>  
> +	rsc = (void *)rproc->table_ptr + rvdev->rsc_offset;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Allocate non-cacheable memory for the vring. In the future
>  	 * this call will also configure the IOMMU for us
>  	 */
> -	va = dma_alloc_coherent(dev->parent, size, &dma, GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> +	dma = rsc->vring[i].pa;
> +
> +	if (rproc->ops->alloc)
> +		va = rproc->ops->alloc(rproc, size, &dma);
> +
> +	if (!va && rsc->vring[i].pa == FW_RSC_ADDR_ANY)
> +		va = dma_alloc_coherent(dev->parent, size, &dma, GFP_KERNEL);
> +
>  	if (!va) {
> -		dev_err(dev->parent, "dma_alloc_coherent failed\n");
> +		dev_err(dev->parent, "Failed to get valid ving[%d] va\n", i);

Error messages isn't the place for abbreviations IMO.

"Failed to allocate memory for ... XXX"

>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -231,7 +241,10 @@ int rproc_alloc_vring(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int i)
>  	ret = idr_alloc(&rproc->notifyids, rvring, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "idr_alloc failed: %d\n", ret);
> -		dma_free_coherent(dev->parent, size, va, dma);
> +		if (rproc->ops->free)
> +			ret = rproc->ops->free(rproc, size, va, dma);
> +		if (!ret)
> +			dma_free_coherent(dev->parent, size, va, dma);

Are you sure this is what you want to do?

Won't this free the memory twice?

Looking at this *very* briefly, shouldn't this be something like:

else if (va)
     dma_free_coherent(dev->parent, size, va, dma);

>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  	notifyid = ret;
> @@ -249,8 +262,8 @@ int rproc_alloc_vring(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int i)
>  	 * set up the iommu. In this case the device address (da) will
>  	 * hold the physical address and not the device address.
>  	 */
> -	rsc = (void *)rproc->table_ptr + rvdev->rsc_offset;
>  	rsc->vring[i].da = dma;
> +	rsc->vring[i].pa = dma;
>  	rsc->vring[i].notifyid = notifyid;
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -273,6 +286,15 @@ rproc_parse_vring(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc, int i)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * pa field was previously reserved and fixed to 0
> +	 * used FW_RSC_ADDR_ANY as default value if 0 detected
> +	 * to keep backward compatibility and have vring allocated
> +	 * by dma_alloc_coherent
> +	 */
> +	if (vring->pa == 0)
> +		vring->pa = FW_RSC_ADDR_ANY;
> +
>  	rvring->len = vring->num;
>  	rvring->align = vring->align;
>  	rvring->rvdev = rvdev;
> @@ -286,8 +308,15 @@ void rproc_free_vring(struct rproc_vring *rvring)
>  	struct rproc *rproc = rvring->rvdev->rproc;
>  	int idx = rvring->rvdev->vring - rvring;
>  	struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (rproc->ops->free)
> +		ret = rproc->ops->free(rproc, size, rvring->va, rvring->dma);
> +
> +	if (!ret)
> +		dma_free_coherent(rproc->dev.parent, size, rvring->va,
> +				  rvring->dma);

Same here.

> -	dma_free_coherent(rproc->dev.parent, size, rvring->va, rvring->dma);
>  	idr_remove(&rproc->notifyids, rvring->notifyid);
>  
>  	/* reset resource entry info */
> @@ -558,7 +587,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_carveout(struct rproc *rproc,
>  	struct rproc_mem_entry *carveout, *mapping;
>  	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
>  	dma_addr_t dma;
> -	void *va;
> +	void *va = NULL;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	if (sizeof(*rsc) > avail) {
> @@ -579,7 +608,15 @@ static int rproc_handle_carveout(struct rproc *rproc,
>  	if (!carveout)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	va = dma_alloc_coherent(dev->parent, rsc->len, &dma, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	dma = rsc->pa;
> +	/* first try platform-specific allocator */

Same comment throughout about comments.

> +	if (rproc->ops->alloc)
> +		va = rproc->ops->alloc(rproc, rsc->len, &dma);
> +
> +	/* use standad method only if region not fixed */
> +	if (!va && rsc->pa == FW_RSC_ADDR_ANY)
> +		va = dma_alloc_coherent(dev->parent, rsc->len, &dma, GFP_KERNEL);
> +
>  	if (!va) {
>  		dev_err(dev->parent,
>  			"failed to allocate dma memory: len 0x%x\n", rsc->len);
> @@ -667,7 +704,10 @@ static int rproc_handle_carveout(struct rproc *rproc,
>  free_mapping:
>  	kfree(mapping);
>  dma_free:
> -	dma_free_coherent(dev->parent, rsc->len, va, dma);
> +	if (rproc->ops->free)
> +		ret = rproc->ops->free(rproc, rsc->len, va, dma);
> +	if (!ret)
> +		dma_free_coherent(dev->parent, rsc->len, va, dma);
>  free_carv:
>  	kfree(carveout);
>  	return ret;
> @@ -748,6 +788,7 @@ static void rproc_resource_cleanup(struct rproc *rproc)
>  	struct rproc_mem_entry *entry, *tmp;
>  	struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, *rvtmp;
>  	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> +	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	/* clean up debugfs trace entries */
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &rproc->traces, node) {
> @@ -774,8 +815,12 @@ static void rproc_resource_cleanup(struct rproc *rproc)
>  
>  	/* clean up carveout allocations */
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &rproc->carveouts, node) {
> -		dma_free_coherent(dev->parent, entry->len, entry->va,
> -				  entry->dma);
> +		if (rproc->ops->free)
> +			ret = rproc->ops->free(rproc, entry->len, entry->va,
> +					       entry->dma);
> +		if (!ret)
> +			dma_free_coherent(dev->parent, entry->len, entry->va,
> +					  entry->dma);

And here I guess.

>  		list_del(&entry->node);
>  		kfree(entry);
>  	}
> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> index c321eab..b2f8227 100644
> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> @@ -331,12 +331,16 @@ struct rproc;
>   * @stop:	power off the device
>   * @kick:	kick a virtqueue (virtqueue id given as a parameter)
>   * @da_to_va:	optional platform hook to perform address translations
> + * @alloc:	alloc requested memory chunck
> + * @free:	release specified memory chunck
>   */
>  struct rproc_ops {
>  	int (*start)(struct rproc *rproc);
>  	int (*stop)(struct rproc *rproc);
>  	void (*kick)(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid);
>  	void * (*da_to_va)(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len);
> +	void * (*alloc)(struct rproc *rproc, int size, dma_addr_t *dma_handle);
> +	int (*free)(struct rproc *rproc, size_t size, void *cpu_addr, dma_addr_t dma_handle);
>  };
>  
>  /**

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-08 14:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-06  7:39 [PATCH v2 0/3] Remoteproc: Add predefined coprocessor memory mapping support Loic Pallardy
2016-09-06  7:39 ` Loic Pallardy
2016-09-06  7:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] remoteproc: Modify FW_RSC_ADDR_ANY definition Loic Pallardy
2016-09-06  7:39   ` Loic Pallardy
2016-09-06 18:10   ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-09-06  7:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] remoteproc: core: transform struct fw_rsc_vdev_vring reserved field in pa Loic Pallardy
2016-09-06  7:39   ` Loic Pallardy
2016-09-06 18:10   ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-09-06  7:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] remoteproc: core: add rproc ops for memory allocation Loic Pallardy
2016-09-06  7:39   ` Loic Pallardy
2016-09-08 14:06   ` Lee Jones [this message]
2016-09-15 17:27   ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-09-16  7:47     ` loic pallardy
2016-09-16  7:47       ` loic pallardy
2016-09-16 18:12       ` Bjorn Andersson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160908140610.GT4921@dell \
    --to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=kernel@stlinux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loic.pallardy@st.com \
    --cc=ohad@wizery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.