From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Open Fabrics Verbs Working Group (OFVWG) meeting tomorrow - 9/13/2016 at 11:00PDT Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 05:30:59 -0700 Message-ID: <20160914123059.GA868@infradead.org> References: <20160913064857.GA5988@infradead.org> <20160913070418.GA31616@infradead.org> <20160913103238.GW8812@leon.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160913103238.GW8812-2ukJVAZIZ/Y@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Parav Pandit , Liran Liss , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "ofvwg-ZwoEplunGu1OwGhvXhtEPSCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 01:32:38PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > I think we're fine now. The non-verbs HFSI interfaces aren't really a > > fit for our inifiband/rdma (it should really be called ibverbs I guess) > > interface. > > Out of curiosity, can you point me to the discussions where you > expressed your objections while hfi1 was added to drivers/inifiniband? No idea what you mean. I'm fine with HFI living in drivers/infiniband, although other places for it might not be wrong either. I'm not fine with HFI exposing the non-verbs interfaces through drivers/infiniband/core interface, which as far as I can tell it currently does not even do, although some discussions here suggest that a future interface should cater to those interface. The real mistake was adding usnic, which has not business in drivers/infiniband/ at all. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html