From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com (sender163-mail.zoho.com [74.201.84.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3sZZwk3Ng2zDsGT for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 20:51:50 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost (76-250-84-236.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [76.250.84.236]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 14739367011841016.7013121335818; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 03:51:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 05:51:29 -0500 From: Patrick Williams To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric?= Le Goater Cc: Joel Stanley , OpenBMC Maillist Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH linux dev-4.7 4/6] misc: Add Aspeed BT IPMI BMC driver Message-ID: <20160915105129.GC25351@heinlein.lan> References: <1473921146-19509-1-git-send-email-clg@kaod.org> <1473921146-19509-5-git-send-email-clg@kaod.org> <38b843b7-24ec-7089-154c-262106afd50c@kaod.org> <22bc13ba-5bf7-3e94-6df1-62d33b50c7cc@kaod.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <22bc13ba-5bf7-3e94-6df1-62d33b50c7cc@kaod.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Zoho-Virus-Status: 1 X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 10:51:51 -0000 --w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:36:46AM +0200, C=E9dric Le Goater wrote: > >> I'm not sure there. When I open /dev/ttyUSB0 I'm talking to the USB0 > >> serial device. When I open /dev/mtd0, I'm talking to the mtd0 device. > >> So when I open /dev/ipmi-bt-bmc, I would expect to talk to the BMC > >> device? > >=20 > > Yes. I went a little too far in the global rename. /dev/ipmi-bt-bmc mak= es=20 >=20 > I meant /dev/ipmi-bt-host ! :) Does it make sense to have these numbered? I thought Brenden proposed an emulated bt-over-i2c. We could also conceive of an SOC that had multiple LPC (+bt) engines to facilitate multiple nodes, or an off-board FPGA to do it. --=20 Patrick Williams --w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJX2n0xAAoJEKsDR8wtAMEZhaYP/j/B41zTRo3e52lzvU43+HOn ELhXU0GMsse83GdwnsV3YAm9jq9pFxvmO0idLoSNEmZ3Wau19r2RkVXBdpeYrqxF VDeLbMKAHAWxQsTFavWWuzmg5uDJ9+RkbjAJnrYKmAOTpfTg2Z0XD7in6GRLWdti cl4DfTMBxhx7Rb+cWi3mNrn4debw+bmE/qwXnTHptUq5fl8Ds8WC01f0FBZZdG0H do9PIgTFX50LFsMa2p0B1bsaU9dMSVzbZ/yQEAjt7h7cRwr9T3VjahAHAmoCLYSJ 53Y5R0QnbyEbv9Bch8nbzHwm3ut9fvTNBdEfbe2s0GLThYH7FaepvFKfUfSZNDTm g7Cxa0b7rfcPlzFVgpwboff7UtDGqGY+HgwOzPiZsK7xFFLKVAn6ajMuvDwCIrzi 5GHaPbI6PsplyBq3fpSk8ahbiWjvkgivTx4yFNBLAMaEKtbpfkHU5Msy2EnT3ZTq P1LXH7K0DZ8qv+Ao2Exds5ND3wJ4OVfqOBrbcwuIASPeOecGck/36Wsifp8sx074 6rRPc4uPUAQs/BtiHUDUbw34KJ+GU24JyB7QgdhbEl2htNzvBzAbfsv9wqgqKruM hC1TaeC9S2YBsOZwYAuxwIr0uwhtURsKnJxhWeSnRhqkLEcKI1BHwMoCngTSwc6M Nap5jhtz2XzTjW0TIlJX =/OGn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR--