From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (relay1.mentorg.com [192.94.38.131]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9BE73D27 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 13:01:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from svr-orw-fem-05.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.43]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1bkWHz-00005r-R2 from Joe_MacDonald@mentor.com ; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 06:01:15 -0700 Received: from burninator (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-05.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.97.43) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 06:01:15 -0700 Received: by burninator (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F2B4A580415; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 09:01:14 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 09:01:14 -0400 From: Joe MacDonald To: Martin Jansa Message-ID: <20160915130114.GA5455@mentor.com> References: <20160915083906.GB2641@jama> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160915083906.GB2641@jama> X-URL: http://github.com/joeythesaint/joe-s-common-environment/tree/master X-Configuration: git://github.com/joeythesaint/joe-s-common-environment.git X-Editor: Vim-704 http://www.vim.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: 3 meta-networking patches X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 13:01:16 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 63129 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7" Content-Disposition: inline --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey Martin, [3 meta-networking patches] On 16.09.15 (Thu 10:39) Martin Jansa wrote: > Hi Joe, >=20 > can you please confirm state of thes change: > https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/128859/ > it's Accepted on patchwork, but still applicable and included i > master-next. Curious. I'll scoop that up this morning. It looks pretty obvious. > I'll drop these 2 from master-next as they are marked as > Rejected/Changes-Requested now: > https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/122365/ > https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/125839/ Yep, the former had a lot of discussion around it and ultimately the rationale wasn't solid. The latter was resolved with patches to waf-samba as a generic solution rather than piecemeal, as this was doing. --=20 -Joe MacDonald. :wq --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJX2puQAAoJEEn8ffcsOfaW6GQIAL7yCZDDoETG7IlruNPijDVY cwT7MQYkSJKhQbg8VDKJEXNR/9g3U3fqHtC4Xwu3cdnnO4jBMi9q5pYrpqXzFrhr Fagw6kSMJMbp5jkp/WCJQRmzJ3u12HYvU1tPVzlQzZduxYi/8dcvD6oNmWqJaEHg Jt22wRoEPx9plQPSO0RUTclaRrqffmvSrUq64tkOWeE7UrmLkvWluPZYQ4qpTrTJ gW4t2qTG44+fsWtFxHIGJVzEh/Hol3WuoBeYHrWaSxfaa0aepyRH3oxwZ/1TC6KM nX1AVmQ1by4ZmyXWE7xS07OxmoZPBh+/IeTlP1tJ1aQNzW6E93ye6CFMQ6lTgUU= =+JIW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7--