From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
To: Filipe Manco <filipe.manco@neclab.eu>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH] xen-netback: fix error handling on netback_probe()
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 15:10:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160915141004.GM15958@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c8e11688-cb11-69f6-2c79-daa0f2b3e8b4@neclab.eu>
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 04:05:17PM +0200, Filipe Manco wrote:
> On 14-09-2016 12:10, Wei Liu wrote:
> >CC xen-devel as well.
> >
> >On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 02:11:27PM +0200, Filipe Manco wrote:
> >>In case of error during netback_probe() (e.g. an entry missing on the
> >>xenstore) netback_remove() is called on the new device, which will set
> >>the device backend state to XenbusStateClosed by calling
> >>set_backend_state(). However, the backend state wasn't initialized by
> >>netback_probe() at this point, which will cause and invalid transaction
> >>and set_backend_state() to BUG().
> >>
> >>Initialize the backend state at the beginning of netback_probe() to
> >>XenbusStateInitialising, and create a new valid state transaction on
> >>set_backend_state(), from XenbusStateInitialising to XenbusStateClosed.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Filipe Manco <filipe.manco@neclab.eu>
> >There is a state machine right before set_backend_state. You would also
> >need to update that.
> Good point I'll update the diagram.
>
> After looking at the diagram and for consistency, shouldn't the transition
> Initialising -> InitWait be handled using set_backend_state()? Currently it
> is done directly in netback_probe() code. If you agree I'll submit a v2 with
> these two changes.
That's fine with me.
Wei.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-15 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-13 12:11 [RFC PATCH] xen-netback: fix error handling on netback_probe() Filipe Manco
2016-09-14 10:10 ` Wei Liu
2016-09-14 10:10 ` Wei Liu
2016-09-15 14:05 ` Filipe Manco
2016-09-15 14:05 ` [Xen-devel] " Filipe Manco
2016-09-15 14:10 ` Wei Liu [this message]
2016-09-15 14:10 ` Wei Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160915141004.GM15958@citrix.com \
--to=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=filipe.manco@neclab.eu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.