All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: mengdong.lin@linux.intel.com
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, tiwai@suse.de,
	hardik.t.shah@intel.com, guneshwor.o.singh@intel.com,
	liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com, vinod.koul@intel.com,
	rakesh.a.ughreja@intel.com, mengdong.lin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] ASoC: topology: Able to create BE DAIs
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 15:56:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160916145651.GD27974@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <084b7ba7ba3f0d4a97641b43fab26aee2dc20c5d.1473420558.git.mengdong.lin@linux.intel.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1480 bytes --]

On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 07:43:11PM +0800, mengdong.lin@linux.intel.com wrote:

> From: Mengdong Lin <mengdong.lin@linux.intel.com>

> Topology will check with ASoC if a BE DAI already exists by checking
> its name. If the BE DAI doesn't exist, topology will create a new one
> and the dai_load ops will be called for device specific init.

I still remain fundamentally unconvinced that this is a good or scalable
idea and that it makes sense to have it be part of the standard topology
ABI.  We are not going to download a DSP firmware that creates a new
physical link in the system so having the topology be the thing creating
those physical links seems wrong.

> create the HDA DAIs. Ideally, the driver should query BIOS to get the
> physical pin output types and connections to peripherals for a specific
> platform, but unfortunately BIOS sometimes does not have accurate info,
> so there is still hard code of BE DAI & DAI links in driver. To share a

Having the connections to the DSP specified in the toplogy is of course
sensible but fundamentally this is always going to be choosing from a
list of physical DAIs that we already know about and potential
connections for those that are also already known.  If the driver wants
to do something in response to a DAI being hooked up into the topology
(which seems to be the actual goal here) that would be sensible but
attempting to create physical hardware in a topology does not seem like
a good idea as a generic feature.

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]



  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-16 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-09 11:41 [PATCH v2 00/11] ASoC: topology: Remaining kernel patches mengdong.lin
2016-09-09 11:43 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] ASoC: topology: Able to create BE DAIs mengdong.lin
2016-09-16 14:56   ` Mark Brown [this message]
2016-09-19 17:09     ` Shah, Hardik T
2016-09-21  5:44       ` Mengdong Lin
2016-09-21  7:09         ` Liam Girdwood
2016-09-24 18:56           ` Mark Brown
2016-09-09 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] ASoC: topology: ABI - Add flags to PCM mengdong.lin
2016-09-09 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] ASoC: topology: ABI - Add private data " mengdong.lin
2016-09-09 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] ASoC: topology: Add FE DAIs only if not already added mengdong.lin
2016-09-09 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] ASoC: topology: ABI - Add name & component info to BE/CC links mengdong.lin
2016-09-09 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] ASoC: topology: ABI - Define DAI physical PCM data formats mengdong.lin
2016-09-09 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] ASoC: topology: ABI - Add HW configurations to BE/CC links mengdong.lin
2016-09-09 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] ASoC: topology: ABI - Add flags and private data " mengdong.lin
2016-09-09 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] ASoC: Define API to find a dai link by id mengdong.lin
2016-09-09 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] ASoC: Probe link components after finding new links mengdong.lin
2016-09-09 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] ASoC: topology: Able to create BE DAI links mengdong.lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160916145651.GD27974@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=guneshwor.o.singh@intel.com \
    --cc=hardik.t.shah@intel.com \
    --cc=liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mengdong.lin@intel.com \
    --cc=mengdong.lin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rakesh.a.ughreja@intel.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.