Re: [PATCH v21 00/20] perf, tools: Add support for PMU events in JSON format

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>]

Em Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 08:31:13PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 06:20:17PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 03:24:37PM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu escreveu:
> > > CPUs support a large number of performance monitoring events (PMU events)
> > > and often these events are very specific to an architecture/model of the
> > > CPU. To use most of these PMU events with perf, we currently have to identify
> > > them by their raw codes:
> > > 
> > > 	perf stat -e r100f2 sleep 1
> > 
> > So, trying to build this with my set of containers I get lots of failures,
> > double checking running on another machine with those containers for the
> > segfault cases, changing sys/fcntl.h to fcntl.h cures the build on alpine:3.4
> > (musl libc), will try to fix all of them.
> > 
> > The list is incomplete, lots of other systems failed as well.
> > 
> > - Arnaldo
> > 
>  1 alpine:3.4: Ok
> 
> Fixed with fcntl.h + capping the maxfds parameter to nftw to avoid it
> exploding on alloca() in environments where rlim_max is set to a high
> value, like in docker.
> 
> Now looking at:
> 
>   CC       /tmp/build/perf/fs/tracing_path.o
> In file included from /git/linux/tools/include/linux/types.h:4:0,
>                  from /opt/android-ndk-r12b/platforms/android-24/arch-arm/usr/include/sys/types.h:35,
>                  from /opt/android-ndk-r12b/platforms/android-24/arch-arm/usr/include/strings.h:42,
>                  from /opt/android-ndk-r12b/platforms/android-24/arch-arm/usr/include/stdlib.h:36,
>                  from pmu-events/json.c:31:
> pmu-events/json.h:15:22: error: two or more data types in declaration specifiers
>  typedef unsigned int bool;
> 
> 
> Which looks like clashing with stdbool.h...

yeah, changing that typedef + true def to plain include <stdbool.h>
makes it progress to the next failure, which is in cross compilation
environments, such as using fedora 24 + the Android NDK to try to build
a ARM android binary.

On the bright side, in addition to alpine:3.4 now these are building ok:

 3 archlinux:latest: Ok
 4 centos:5: Ok
 5 centos:6: Ok
 6 centos:7: Ok
 7 debian:7: Ok
 8 debian:8: Ok
 9 fedora:20: Ok

Waiting for some extra cross compilation envs to check that hunch...

- Arnaldo