From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [RFC v2 06/12] qedr: Add support for QP verbs Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 09:55:09 -0600 Message-ID: <20160921155509.GC1510@obsidianresearch.com> References: <1474367764-9555-1-git-send-email-Ram.Amrani@cavium.com> <1474367764-9555-7-git-send-email-Ram.Amrani@cavium.com> <20160920152849.GD32020@obsidianresearch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "Amrani, Ram" Cc: "davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org" , "dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org" , "Elior, Ariel" , "Kalderon, Michal" , "Mintz, Yuval" , "Borundia, Rajesh" , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 02:23:46PM +0000, Amrani, Ram wrote: > > Ugh, each patch keeps adding to this? > > The logic in the patch series is to have each patch contain only > what is necessary for the specific functionality it adds. This made > it harder on us to prepare but, IMHO, easier for the reviewer. If > you'd like to have this file in one chunk, I can do this. What do > you prefer? I wouldn't change anything at this point, but I'm not sure it is easier to review like this than the one patch per file scheme. Do you have a git tree? Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html