From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>,
Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c / ACPI: Do not touch an I2C device if it belongs to another adapter
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:59:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160922085924.GB1433@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160922084930.GI1218@lahna.fi.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 431 bytes --]
> > Huh? It doesn't apply on top of rc7 here? What did you base it on?
>
> It is based on linux-next as it is on top of Jarkko's I2C ACPI namespace
> cleanup patches. I'm wondering if I make an updated patch on top of
> v4.8-rc7 does it conflict with the I2C stuff in linux-next? What's your
> preference?
I see. I'll add it to for-next, then. If someone wants it backported, it
needs to be rewritten and re-tested.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-22 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <87a8f4kfhe.fsf@gmail.com>
2016-09-19 8:48 ` [REGRESSION? v4.8] i2c-core: acpi_i2c_get_info() touches non-existent devices Mika Westerberg
2016-09-19 13:03 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-09-19 13:58 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-09-20 7:55 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-09-20 8:00 ` [PATCH] i2c / ACPI: Do not touch an I2C device if it belongs to another adapter Mika Westerberg
2016-09-20 10:32 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-09-20 10:45 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-09-20 13:59 ` [PATCH v2] " Mika Westerberg
2016-09-20 18:49 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-09-21 5:48 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-09-21 8:45 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-09-21 16:14 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-09-22 8:49 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-09-22 8:59 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2016-09-22 9:25 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-09-22 17:46 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160922085924.GB1433@katana \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=nicstange@gmail.com \
--cc=octavian.purdila@intel.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.