All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>
To: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Cc: helgaas@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] PCI/Hotplug: Schedule device add retries
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 15:05:20 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160922210519.GA6274@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160922151811.GA14301@keith>

> >  err_exit:
> > +	if (ctrl->slot_retries++ < DEVICE_ADD_RETRIES) {
> > +		ctrl_dbg(ctrl, "Retrying (%d/%d) device add at %04x:%02x:00\n",
> > +			ctrl->slot_retries, DEVICE_ADD_RETRIES,
> > +			pci_domain_nr(parent), parent->number);
> > +		pciehp_queue_power_work(p_slot, ENABLE_RETRY_REQ);
> > +		return retval;
> > +	}
> 
> Does the retry need to be requeued instead of just doing this in a loop?

The requeue gives a little bit more time and performs the actions in pciehp_enable_slot in case something has changed.

We could push the loop to within pciehp_enable_slot, but that could cause us to potentially miss DISABLE_REQ events.
..
That brings up the question about racing with DISBALE_REQ. If a power controller is implemented, a DISABLE_REQ request will disable the slot, which could then be reenabled by the ENABLE_RETRY_REQ path. Would disabling and reenabling the slot's power just cause the same faults over and over again? I'm not so sure.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-22 21:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-21 19:12 [PATCHv2] PCI/Hotplug: Schedule device add retries Jon Derrick
2016-09-22 15:18 ` Keith Busch
2016-09-22 21:05   ` Jon Derrick [this message]
2016-10-21 21:22 ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160922210519.GA6274@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=jonathan.derrick@intel.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.