From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: ehabkost@redhat.com, crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com,
armbru@redhat.com, p.fedin@samsung.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
lcapitulino@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 06/16] sev: add Secure Encrypted Virtulization (SEV) support
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 22:51:26 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160922223921-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <147455596937.8519.6403549430047219068.stgit@brijesh-build-machine>
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:52:49AM -0400, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> # $QEMU \
> -object sev-receive-info,id=launch0,flags.ks=off \
> -object sev-guest-info,id=sev0,launch=launch0 \
> -object security-policy,id=secure0,memory-encryption=sev0 \
> -machine ....,security-policy=secure0
Looks like most of info in a sev object is actually quite generic.
Let's give it readable generic names please, it will be easier to
review then. For example sev-guest-info -> memory-encryption-guest-info,
etc.
+Bit 0 (debug) - Debugging of the guest is disallowed when set
+Bit 1 (ks) - Sharing keys with other guests is disallowed when set
+Bit 2 (reserved) - must be set to 1
+Bit 3 (nosend) - Sending the guest to another platform is disallowed when set
+Bit 4 (domain) - The guest must not be transmitted to another platform that is not in the domain when set
+Bit 5 (sev) - The guest must not be transmitted to another platform that is not SEV capable when set.
+Bit 15:6 (reserved)
+Bit 16:24 (fw_major) - The guest must not be transmitted to another platform that is not SEV capable when set.
+Bit 25:31 (fw_minor) - The guest must not be transmitted to another platform that is not SEV capable when set.
So e.g. ks -> key-sharing=off. Etc.
And please include documentation about what does each of these things
actually do, so we can discuss whether we even need all of these knobs.
For example: key-sharing=off - will this mean that starting two VMs with
same key on same host fails?
But is it ever useful to do allow key sharing?
Etc.
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-22 19:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-22 14:51 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 00/16] x86: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (AMD) Brijesh Singh
2016-09-22 14:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 01/16] memattrs: add debug attrs Brijesh Singh
2016-09-22 14:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 02/16] exec: add guest RAM read and write ops Brijesh Singh
2016-09-22 15:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-09-22 14:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 03/16] exec: add debug version of physical memory read and write apis Brijesh Singh
2016-09-22 15:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-09-22 14:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 04/16] monitor: use debug version of memory access apis Brijesh Singh
2016-09-22 15:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-09-22 19:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-09-22 20:55 ` Brijesh Singh
2016-09-22 14:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 05/16] core: add new security-policy object Brijesh Singh
2016-09-22 14:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 06/16] sev: add Secure Encrypted Virtulization (SEV) support Brijesh Singh
2016-09-22 15:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-09-22 21:12 ` Brijesh Singh
2016-09-22 21:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-09-22 19:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2016-09-22 14:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 07/16] hmp: display memory encryption support in 'info kvm' Brijesh Singh
2016-09-22 15:32 ` Eric Blake
2016-09-22 14:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 08/16] core: loader: create memory encryption context before copying data Brijesh Singh
2016-09-22 14:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 09/16] sev: add LAUNCH_START command Brijesh Singh
2016-09-22 14:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 10/16] sev: add LAUNCH_UPDATE command Brijesh Singh
2016-09-22 14:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 11/16] sev: add LAUNCH_FINISH command Brijesh Singh
2016-09-22 14:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 12/16] sev: add DEBUG_DECRYPT command Brijesh Singh
2016-09-22 14:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 13/16] sev: add DEBUG_ENCRYPT command Brijesh Singh
2016-09-22 14:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 14/16] i386: set memory encryption ops for PC.BIOS and PC.RAM regions Brijesh Singh
2016-09-22 14:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 15/16] target-i386: add cpuid Fn8000_001f Brijesh Singh
2016-09-22 14:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 16/16] i386: clear C-bit in SEV guest page table walk Brijesh Singh
2016-09-22 15:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 00/16] x86: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (AMD) no-reply
2016-09-22 15:54 ` no-reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160922223921-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=p.fedin@samsung.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.