From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758217AbcIWJVn (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2016 05:21:43 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:43772 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752772AbcIWJVk (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2016 05:21:40 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 11:21:42 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Holger =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hoffst=E4tte?= Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah.kh@samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/118] 4.4.22-stable review Message-ID: <20160923092142.GA1071@kroah.com> References: <20160922172938.643879685@linuxfoundation.org> <57E4376C.2000109@applied-asynchrony.com> <20160923081451.GF18056@kroah.com> <57E4EB2F.4070505@applied-asynchrony.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <57E4EB2F.4070505@applied-asynchrony.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:43:27AM +0200, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > On 09/23/16 10:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 09:56:28PM +0200, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > >> did you forget to add the -net patches in stable-queue.git/tree/net-4.4 > >> or are they on hold for some reason? I think they were supposed to go > >> into .22. > > > > Really? I just put them there as I was pondering applying them, waiting > > for the network maintainer to send me some more patches, or not. They > > Ahh..alright then. > > > Why do you think they should go into this release? > > Never mind - they are not really urgent. I just had most of them merged > locally already and was just wondering. If you have them merged, and tested, mind sending them to me with your tested-by mark on them? That way I know they work and can focus on the ones that will require backporting effort. thanks, greg k-h From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:43772 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752772AbcIWJVk (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2016 05:21:40 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 11:21:42 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Holger =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hoffst=E4tte?= Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah.kh@samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/118] 4.4.22-stable review Message-ID: <20160923092142.GA1071@kroah.com> References: <20160922172938.643879685@linuxfoundation.org> <57E4376C.2000109@applied-asynchrony.com> <20160923081451.GF18056@kroah.com> <57E4EB2F.4070505@applied-asynchrony.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <57E4EB2F.4070505@applied-asynchrony.com> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:43:27AM +0200, Holger Hoffst�tte wrote: > On 09/23/16 10:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 09:56:28PM +0200, Holger Hoffst�tte wrote: > >> did you forget to add the -net patches in stable-queue.git/tree/net-4.4 > >> or are they on hold for some reason? I think they were supposed to go > >> into .22. > > > > Really? I just put them there as I was pondering applying them, waiting > > for the network maintainer to send me some more patches, or not. They > > Ahh..alright then. > > > Why do you think they should go into this release? > > Never mind - they are not really urgent. I just had most of them merged > locally already and was just wondering. If you have them merged, and tested, mind sending them to me with your tested-by mark on them? That way I know they work and can focus on the ones that will require backporting effort. thanks, greg k-h