From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 17:05:03 +0200 From: Greg KH Message-ID: <20160923150503.GC13744@kroah.com> References: <0FE76768-B446-4079-91CE-7A0F6A3B0F7C@zonoff.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <0FE76768-B446-4079-91CE-7A0F6A3B0F7C@zonoff.com> Subject: Re: [Fuego] [LTSI-dev] Value of the Fuego to kernel "integrators"? List-Id: Mailing list for the Fuego test framework List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Doug Crawford Cc: "ltsi-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , "fuego@lists.linuxfoundation.org" On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:09:02AM -0400, Doug Crawford via LTSI-dev wrote: > A perception in our organization is that Fuego is intended for kernel > developers in the development of long term supported kernels. > We are more “kernel integrators”; we pick up LTS kernels through > Yocto, and integrate them with our choice of file system and device > drivers. What filesystems and device drivers do you use that are not already upstream in the kernel.org releases? Need any help getting them merged properly? thanks, greg k-h