From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig) Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 01:42:36 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v4 0/3] nvme power saving In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20160923234236.GA19222@lst.de> Jens, can we at least get patches 1 and 2 in while pondering the fate of the right interface for patch 3? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758267AbcIWXmj (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2016 19:42:39 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:40603 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752053AbcIWXmi (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2016 19:42:38 -0400 Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 01:42:36 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Keith Busch , Jens Axboe , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, J Freyensee Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] nvme power saving Message-ID: <20160923234236.GA19222@lst.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jens, can we at least get patches 1 and 2 in while pondering the fate of the right interface for patch 3?