From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:42836 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966373AbcIYPI0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Sep 2016 11:08:26 -0400 Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 17:08:30 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Holger =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hoffst=E4tte?= Cc: patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/118] 4.4.22-stable review Message-ID: <20160925150830.GA20402@kroah.com> References: <20160922172938.643879685@linuxfoundation.org> <57E4376C.2000109@applied-asynchrony.com> <20160923081451.GF18056@kroah.com> <57E4EB2F.4070505@applied-asynchrony.com> <20160923092142.GA1071@kroah.com> <57E50AA4.4050303@applied-asynchrony.com> <20160923151302.GB14168@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20160923151302.GB14168@kroah.com> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 05:13:02PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:57:40PM +0200, Holger Hoffst�tte wrote: > > (trimmed To:) > > > > On 09/23/16 11:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:43:27AM +0200, Holger Hoffst�tte wrote: > > >> On 09/23/16 10:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > >>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 09:56:28PM +0200, Holger Hoffst�tte wrote: > > >>>> did you forget to add the -net patches in stable-queue.git/tree/net-4.4 > > >>>> or are they on hold for some reason? I think they were supposed to go > > >>>> into .22. > > >>> > > >>> Really? I just put them there as I was pondering applying them, waiting > > >>> for the network maintainer to send me some more patches, or not. They > > >> > > >> Ahh..alright then. > > >> > > >>> Why do you think they should go into this release? > > >> > > >> Never mind - they are not really urgent. I just had most of them merged > > >> locally already and was just wondering. > > > > > > If you have them merged, and tested, mind sending them to me with your > > > tested-by mark on them? That way I know they work and can focus on the > > > ones that will require backporting effort. > > > > Attached. All with Tested-By are working and have done so for some > > time without issue (mixed ipv4/6 network in various functions). > > > > ipv6-addrconf-fix-dev-refcont-leak-when-dad-failed: > > seems to be already applied from a previous series, not sure which. > > > > tcp-cwnd-does-not-increase-in-tcp-yeah: > > For this I can only offer a Reviewed-by: since I cannot test it, > > but I did check that the code does what the comment says, and it > > merges/compiles cleanly. > > > > Hope this helps. > > It does, I'll queue these up for the next round, many thanks. Now all applied, thanks again! greg k-h