All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/vxlan: Avoid unaligned access in vxlan_build_skb()
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 15:56:44 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160928195644.GA10249@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKgT0UeEFoA8EQN0Fgn656mFDqC6BdnrUqUfQAJSgEwRBUxBZw@mail.gmail.com>

On (09/28/16 11:08), Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > - then udp_gro_receive -> vxlan_gro_receive pulls up vxlan header
> >   into linear part, and then..
> 
> This is the point where we need to stop, drop the existing headers,
> call skb_reserve(NET_IP_ALIGN), and then pick back up where we left
> off.  We just have to make sure the skbuff isn't shared.
  :
> In general the interface behind the tunnel shouldn't need to know
> about any of the data in front of the tunnel, so you should be able to
> drop the original header offsets and reset things if you want so you
> could overwrite the old headers.

Except that some of these encapsulations may be doing things like
[inner-mac, outer-ip] fdb learning, so we may not be able to lose
the outer headers at this early point in all cases.

> If I am not mistaken I think the multi-buffer approach is the approach
> taken by other OSes, although for us it is more difficult since we

yes, I think that's approximately what gets done with mblk/mbufs
(with pullups as needed). But as you point out, this type of
->frag_list chaining is a non-trivial change.

> I'm sure we are all going to be talking about this in great detail
> next week at netdev/netconf.. :-)

Agree.

--Sowmini

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-28 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-20 14:27 [PATCH net-next] net/vxlan: Avoid unaligned access in vxlan_build_skb() Sowmini Varadhan
2016-09-20 15:31 ` Tom Herbert
2016-09-20 15:49   ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-09-20 16:11 ` Jiri Benc
2016-09-20 16:31   ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-09-20 16:43     ` Jiri Benc
2016-09-20 17:07       ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-09-20 17:15         ` Jiri Benc
2016-09-20 17:09       ` Jiri Benc
2016-09-20 17:19         ` Tom Herbert
2016-09-20 17:24         ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-09-22  5:52         ` David Miller
2016-09-22 21:30           ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-09-23 12:06             ` David Miller
2016-09-23 14:17               ` Alexander Duyck
2016-09-23 17:20                 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-09-23 17:38                   ` Alexander Duyck
2016-09-23 23:41                     ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-09-24  0:43                       ` Alexander Duyck
2016-09-28 17:03                         ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-09-28 18:08                           ` Alexander Duyck
2016-09-28 19:56                             ` Sowmini Varadhan [this message]
2016-09-20 16:45 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160928195644.GA10249@oracle.com \
    --to=sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com \
    --cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.