From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755311AbcI2IdI (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Sep 2016 04:33:08 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:53408 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755200AbcI2Ic7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Sep 2016 04:32:59 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:33:01 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Kevin Hilman Cc: "kernelci.org bot" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah.kh@samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.7 00/69] 4.7.6-stable review Message-ID: <20160929083301.GB5979@kroah.com> References: <20160928090445.054716307@linuxfoundation.org> <57ec0654.4756c20a.c7ddf.48d1@mx.google.com> <7ha8erru8h.fsf@baylibre.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7ha8erru8h.fsf@baylibre.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 01:22:06AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > kernelci.org bot writes: > > > stable-rc boot: 105 boots: 1 failed, 100 passed with 4 offline (v4.7.5-70-g64e4c0f6d4b1) > > > > Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/kernel/v4.7.5-70-g64e4c0f6d4b1/ > > Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/kernel/v4.7.5-70-g64e4c0f6d4b1/ > > > > Tree: stable-rc > > Branch: local/linux-4.7.y > > Git Describe: v4.7.5-70-g64e4c0f6d4b1 > > Git Commit: 64e4c0f6d4b12abd1966ac9ad2082a0815a3d0eb > > Git URL: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > > Tested: 32 unique boards, 12 SoC families, 20 builds out of 205 > > > > Boot Failure Detected: https://kernelci.org/boot/?v4.7.5-70-g64e4c0f6d4b1&fail > > > > arm: > > > > multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y: > > at91-sama5d3_xplained: 1 failed lab > > This looks like a legit new failure, and the same thing is happening on > stable-rc/linux-4.4.y. > > I've asked the lab with this board to have a closer look, Thanks, I don't see anything obvious in the patch series that would have affected this board, but given the PROVE_LOCKING option, maybe it was a more generic change that is causing the issue. greg k-h