From: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 4/4] net/sched: act_mirred: Implement ingress actions
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 13:35:36 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160929133536.79de5ae6@halley> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1475011633.28155.68.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Hi Eric,
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:27:13 -0700 Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Since this runs lockless, another cpu might change m->tcfm_eaction in
> the middle, and you could call dev_queue_xmit(skb2) while the skb2 was
> prepared for the opposite action.
Well, seem members of 'struct tcf_mirred' are out of sync wrt to each
other, even in existing code, regadless this patch:
- 'tcfm_dev' may be assigned, but 'tcfm_ok_push' not yet updated,
may result in skb_push_rcsum being called/not called
- 'tcfm_eaction' is changed, in between "mirror is always swallowed" to
the final 'out:' label,
may result in wrong tc_verd assigned (or lack of assignment)
Seems the whole "params" need be rcu_dereferenced, like in
tunnel_key_act, or like your suggestion in
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/667680/.
I'm gonna fix the new problem you pointed out, by reading-once
'tcfm_eaction' early (right when tcfm_dev is dereferenced) knowing this
is just "keeping things as is wrt running lockless", without introducing
any new non-coherent code.
Thanks,
Shmulik
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-29 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-27 20:59 [PATCH v2 net-next 0/4] act_mirred: Ingress actions support Shmulik Ladkani
2016-09-27 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 1/4] net/sched: act_mirred: Rename tcfm_ok_push to tcfm_mac_header_xmit and make it a bool Shmulik Ladkani
2016-09-27 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 2/4] net/sched: act_mirred: Refactor detection whether dev needs xmit at mac header Shmulik Ladkani
2016-09-27 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 3/4] net/sched: tc_mirred: Rename public predicates 'is_tcf_mirred_redirect' and 'is_tcf_mirred_mirror' Shmulik Ladkani
2016-09-27 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 4/4] net/sched: act_mirred: Implement ingress actions Shmulik Ladkani
2016-09-27 21:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-09-27 21:42 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-09-27 22:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-09-29 10:35 ` Shmulik Ladkani [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160929133536.79de5ae6@halley \
--to=shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.