From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57763)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <berrange@redhat.com>) id 1brLDK-00085w-GS
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 04:36:39 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <berrange@redhat.com>) id 1brLDG-0004h5-Pv
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 04:36:38 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48158)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <berrange@redhat.com>) id 1brLDG-0004gf-JF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 04:36:34 -0400
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 09:36:28 +0100
From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20161004083628.GB5578@redhat.com>
Reply-To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
References: <20160923110300.23502.55001.malonedeb@soybean.canonical.com>
	<20160927030621.20862-1-rafael.tinoco@canonical.com>
	<20160927083626.GC3967@redhat.com>
	<7220810B-7C81-4B51-BDE5-7BC0022F3605@canonical.com>
	<20160927121841.GM3967@redhat.com>
	<3F76E640-1E36-4C4A-8BB9-1DD1EF602FEF@canonical.com>
	<20161003175539.GO13491@redhat.com>
	<DC1DD29F-BC29-41BD-957C-97DB3F3D3D5F@gmail.com>
	<BDC5F1BF-6DB2-4D00-9FF4-3E1219DABDE3@canonical.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BDC5F1BF-6DB2-4D00-9FF4-3E1219DABDE3@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1626972] Re: [PATCH] util: secure
 memfd_create fallback mechanism
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco@canonical.com>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Bug 1626972 <1626972@bugs.launchpad.net>

On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 04:15:55PM -0300, Rafael David Tinoco wrote:
> Yes, definitely. Check this:

[snip]

So in that case, I think we must add ability to specify an explicit path
that apps can use *regardles* of whether memfd support exists or not.

> > On Oct 03, 2016, at 15:46, Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco@canonical.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> So you're saying that the file descriptor here is actually getting
> >> passed to a different process for it to use ?
> 

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-    http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|