From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50312)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1brMNn-0005tH-BX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 05:51:32 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1brMNj-0007yf-31
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 05:51:30 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:14430)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1brMNi-0007yR-SM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 05:51:27 -0400
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 11:51:22 +0200
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20161004095122.GD5316@noname.str.redhat.com>
References: <1475108205-6043-1-git-send-email-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
	<20160929081416.GD5312@redhat.com>
	<8b3cbb6a-1e95-20e8-e34e-d25f790855ff@suse.de>
	<20160929102122.GL5312@redhat.com>
	<2f804b68-2438-b877-e4c3-be48e6d12000@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2f804b68-2438-b877-e4c3-be48e6d12000@suse.de>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/4] QOM class properties - do we need them?
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>, peter.maydell@linaro.org, armbru@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, lcapitulino@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

Am 29.09.2016 um 12:23 hat Andreas F=E4rber geschrieben:
> Am 29.09.2016 um 12:21 schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:12:32PM +0200, Andreas F=E4rber wrote:
> >> Am 29.09.2016 um 10:14 schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
> >>> Practically all instances properties should become class properties
> >>> as its going to save wasting memory once most are converted.
> >>
> >> Not all, but most. child<> properties were the reason to have proper=
ties
> >> on the instance.
> >=20
> > That's why I said "Practically all", instead of just "all" :-)
>=20
> To me as non-native speaker "practically" is the opposite of
> "theoretically". :)

To me it made perfect sense that "pratically all" means "praktisch
alle". ;-)

Kevin