From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from thejh.net ([37.221.195.125]:34756 "EHLO thejh.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936409AbcJEWQK (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2016 18:16:10 -0400 Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 00:16:06 +0200 From: Jann Horn To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: 3dfb7d8cdbc7 missed in caaee6234d05 backport, at least for 3.10? Message-ID: <20161005221606.GT14666@pc.thejh.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xYeFQzU4VZLrHqxU" Content-Disposition: inline Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --xYeFQzU4VZLrHqxU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline I just noticed that apparently, when caaee6234d05 was backported to 3.10, 3dfb7d8cdbc7 was not. That probably breaks Yama. Sorry for not having noticed that during the stable patch review. :/ I guess I should put explicit notices regarding patch dependencies in fix commit messages in the future. --xYeFQzU4VZLrHqxU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJX9XumAAoJED4KNFJOeCOo3i8QANNP1Mx3ArvYN9P8lF+LUemg ryBvlFlgwEQ648EMnk6tRngCnQ6LOwOJQ5h4j2vZtQ+O4cw7ww/uGZ3pYn+Km7cF WuWd2vzUVDQspnaSg9nBaDx3GcefSquoqey6wirSyS9J+Bp7qoDQzO1FG0bdods3 OVwAJXSJkagPyNAPMK8qW0bv2qHEYFjk8E1fK1IFVHeSpsrNY7CdZegu3vStBEcr 2Ec5VPTa/AP3fl/wn6AUSiBgYX3tqhAPgQiMkgxD6QiYbfqH9uwvDQ5nwMj32L+S psSqty4C1OuEHwiG5n9fSCVX/z+mCWyaRa+YS4EtbHtmYOzl3n2+ms/ZClq4Nuub qc0uao59AyiOMCmxLVIIG4m2bbGQWEJIwAFU+5+H2mWZLQN8q6bchRCz0hCoW8JX OBB9WWPjN3WN7MaCc8dkF21xbVSO4rvE3NUx3cHZJ16fRgwaeRaqJeq5JQf0p9da EwJ2mroESQ7NaASFj2hXyVl82yr3MwBxfkQlhRzMmeX73KCsiTtc4kW9Ix6WGtCW 6hO2AN0nckoai0JGTgIPHa/DNePH97/16YoqHzx09MW4KmPfpEiJwfpN5IVOlD3/ f2y3CVVYCZnLYBzn8dJ9RyNu5T9UzXI3wnYtGSfNtgHG7JYgZItubW++v0AcKktg UOqmdkCZ0bb9sli6wRKq =ZzUr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xYeFQzU4VZLrHqxU--