diff for duplicates of <20161010152948.GD14561@arm.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index bfe314b..8bf2779 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -2,11 +2,11 @@ Hi Fredrik, [adding Mathieu -- background is getcpu() in userspace for arm] -On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 12:17:07AM +0200, Fredrik Markstr?m wrote: +On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 12:17:07AM +0200, Fredrik Markström wrote: > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk > > wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 06:48:05PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: -> >> On 05/10/16 17:39, Fredrik Markstr?m wrote: +> >> On 05/10/16 17:39, Fredrik Markström wrote: > >> > The approach I suggested below with the vDSO data page will obviously > >> > not work on smp, so suggestions are welcome. > >> @@ -42,13 +42,13 @@ we've been holding off implementing an optimised getcpu in the arm64 vdso, because it might all well be replaced by the new restartable sequences approach: - http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1471637274-13583-1-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com + http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1471637274-13583-1-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com He's also got support for arch/arm/ in that series, so you could take them for a spin. The main thing missing at the moment is justification for the feature using real-world code, as requested by Linus: - http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFz+Q33m1+ju3ANaznBwYCcWo9D9WDr2=p0YLEF4gJF12g at mail.gmail.com + http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFz+Q33m1+ju3ANaznBwYCcWo9D9WDr2=p0YLEF4gJF12g@mail.gmail.com so if your per-cpu buffer use-case is compelling in its own right (as opposed to a micro-benchmark), then you could chime in over there. diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 0cd6491..4439b1d 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -6,21 +6,38 @@ "ref\050e025e0-7052-9b15-3b3e-36d1d9dfd695@arm.com\0" "ref\020161005195359.GR1041@n2100.armlinux.org.uk\0" "ref\0CAKdL+dSt+cBCpwW5q+VCQh+7XeKrnyJgfTsEsuo2nKoUr9ytxw@mail.gmail.com\0" - "From\0will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)\0" - "Subject\0[PATCH v2] arm: Added support for getcpu() vDSO using TPIDRURW\0" + "From\0Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>\0" + "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2] arm: Added support for getcpu() vDSO using TPIDRURW\0" "Date\0Mon, 10 Oct 2016 16:29:48 +0100\0" - "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0Fredrik Markstr\303\266m <fredrik.markstrom@gmail.com>\0" + "Cc\0Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>" + Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> + Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> + Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> + Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> + Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> + Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> + Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org> + kristina.martsenko@arm.com + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> + Chris Brandt <chris.brandt@renesas.com> + Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com> + Zhaoxiu Zeng <zhaoxiu.zeng@gmail.com> + linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org + Jonathan Austin <jonathan.austin@arm.com> + " mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "Hi Fredrik,\n" "\n" "[adding Mathieu -- background is getcpu() in userspace for arm]\n" "\n" - "On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 12:17:07AM +0200, Fredrik Markstr?m wrote:\n" + "On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 12:17:07AM +0200, Fredrik Markstr\303\266m wrote:\n" "> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk\n" "> > wrote:\n" "> > On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 06:48:05PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:\n" - "> >> On 05/10/16 17:39, Fredrik Markstr?m wrote:\n" + "> >> On 05/10/16 17:39, Fredrik Markstr\303\266m wrote:\n" "> >> > The approach I suggested below with the vDSO data page will obviously\n" "> >> > not work on smp, so suggestions are welcome.\n" "> >>\n" @@ -56,17 +73,17 @@ "because it might all well be replaced by the new restartable sequences\n" "approach:\n" "\n" - " http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1471637274-13583-1-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com\n" + " http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1471637274-13583-1-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com\n" "\n" "He's also got support for arch/arm/ in that series, so you could take\n" "them for a spin. The main thing missing at the moment is justification\n" "for the feature using real-world code, as requested by Linus:\n" "\n" - " http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFz+Q33m1+ju3ANaznBwYCcWo9D9WDr2=p0YLEF4gJF12g at mail.gmail.com\n" + " http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFz+Q33m1+ju3ANaznBwYCcWo9D9WDr2=p0YLEF4gJF12g@mail.gmail.com\n" "\n" "so if your per-cpu buffer use-case is compelling in its own right (as\n" "opposed to a micro-benchmark), then you could chime in over there.\n" "\n" Will -c5e301458629e5007a83fa8878fa8a23902daa2e5e847c007eeaef35a3a8d557 +bb515e1b7acd4c0ab7646535bd64e940826669f43e31bf7e03cf6bb94a982d8b
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.