Re: [v2 1/3] x86: refactor psr implementation in hypervisor.

[Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>]

On 16-10-10 01:34:47, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 09.10.16 at 08:43, <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On 16-09-30 17:18:33, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:15:20AM +0800, Yi Sun wrote:
> >> > Current psr.c is designed for supporting L3 CAT/CDP. It has many
> >> > limitations to add new feature. Considering to support more PSR
> >> > features, we need refactor PSR implementation to make it more
> >> > flexible and fulfill the principle, open for extension but closed
> >> > for modification.
> >> > 
> >> > The core of the refactoring is to abstract the common actions and
> >> > encapsulate them into "struct feat_ops". The detailed steps to add
> >> > a new feature are described at the head of psr.c.
> >> > 
> >> > Signed-off-by: Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>
> >> > 
> >> > ---
> >> > Changed since v1:
> >> >  * sysctl.c
> >> >     - Interface change for abstraction requirement.
> >> >  * psr.c
> >> >     - Function and variables names are changed to express accurately.
> >> >     - Fix code style issues.
> >> >     - Fix imprecise comments.
> >> >     - Add one callback function, get_cos_num(), to fulfill the
> >> >       abstraction requirement.
> >> >     - Divide get_old_set_new() callback functions into two functions:
> >> >       get_old_val() and set_new_val() make it more primitive.
> >> >     - Change feat_info type from an array to union.
> >> >     - Adjust some functions to replace if to switch to make them
> >> >       clearer.
> >> >     - Replace custom list management to system.
> >> >     - Use 'const' to make codes more safe.
> >> >  * psr.h
> >> >     - Change 'enum mask_type' to 'enum psr_val_type' to express
> >> >       more accurate.
> >> >     - Change parameters of psr_get_info() to fulfill abstraction
> >> >       requirement.
> >> > ---
> >> >  xen/arch/x86/domctl.c     |   36 +-
> >> >  xen/arch/x86/psr.c        | 1105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >> 
> >> Whoa. 1K changes. This is a dense patch.
> >> 
> > Yes, a little big because it refactors psr.c. :-)
> 
> Please nevertheless strive to break it up some, to aid reviewing. I
> have to admit that I'm on the edge of NAK-ing such a hard to review
> change to code that is of no core interest (at least as long as all of
> this remains Atom-only).
> 
Very sorry for this. I will try my best to split this big patch to
some small patches in V3.

> Also to both of you: Please limit the quoting in your replies.

Got it. Thank you for guidance!

> 
> Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel