From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
nm@ti.com, sboyd@codeaurora.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
robh@kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] PM / OPP: Multiple regulator support
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 07:41:18 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161012021118.GA19385@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57FBEA16.2010502@ti.com>
On 10-10-16, 14:20, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> Cool, I'm reviewing these patches still but I definitely plan to test them
> out on the TI platforms requiring multi-regulator support. At first glance
> it looks like it does give us the hooks we need. I believe we can use
> cpufreq-dt as is and just provide the regulators before it probes.
Yes you can. That's how I tested it as well.
--
viresh
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-12 2:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-04 11:56 [PATCH 0/8] PM / OPP: Multiple regulator support Viresh Kumar
2016-10-04 11:56 ` [PATCH 1/8] PM / OPP: Reword binding supporting multiple regulators per device Viresh Kumar
[not found] ` <ea6ba87d6514dcec7bee222b401ab904a78e67e6.1475581665.git.viresh.kumar-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-09 1:29 ` Rob Herring
2016-10-09 1:29 ` Rob Herring
2016-10-04 11:56 ` [PATCH 2/8] PM / OPP: Don't use OPP structure outside of rcu protected section Viresh Kumar
2016-10-04 11:56 ` [PATCH 3/8] PM / OPP: Manage supply's voltage/current in a separate structure Viresh Kumar
2016-10-12 21:15 ` Dave Gerlach
2016-10-12 21:15 ` Dave Gerlach
2016-10-13 5:42 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-04 11:56 ` [PATCH 4/8] PM / OPP: Pass struct dev_pm_opp_supply to _set_opp_voltage() Viresh Kumar
2016-10-04 11:56 ` [PATCH 5/8] PM / OPP: Add infrastructure to manage multiple regulators Viresh Kumar
2016-10-04 11:56 ` [PATCH 6/8] PM / OPP: Separate out _generic_opp_set_rate() Viresh Kumar
2016-10-04 11:56 ` [PATCH 7/8] PM / OPP: Allow platform specific custom opp_set_rate() callbacks Viresh Kumar
2016-10-05 1:29 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-11 22:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-10-12 2:10 ` [PATCH V2 " Viresh Kumar
2016-10-04 11:56 ` [PATCH 8/8] PM / OPP: Don't WARN on multiple calls to dev_pm_opp_set_regulators() Viresh Kumar
2016-10-10 19:20 ` [PATCH 0/8] PM / OPP: Multiple regulator support Dave Gerlach
2016-10-10 19:20 ` Dave Gerlach
2016-10-12 2:11 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161012021118.GA19385@vireshk-i7 \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=d-gerlach@ti.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.