From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6340039489286569984 X-Received: by 10.129.107.68 with SMTP id g65mr336754ywc.101.1476283207686; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 07:40:07 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.157.0.98 with SMTP id 89ls3798968ota.5.gmail; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 07:40:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.129.103.135 with SMTP id b129mr380193ywc.14.1476283207181; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 07:40:07 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org. [140.211.169.12]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7si1453400par.0.2016.10.12.07.40.07 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Oct 2016 07:40:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gregkh@linuxfoundation.org designates 140.211.169.12 as permitted sender) client-ip=140.211.169.12; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gregkh@linuxfoundation.org designates 140.211.169.12 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Received: from localhost (pes75-3-78-192-101-3.fbxo.proxad.net [78.192.101.3]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 60B86256; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 14:40:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:40:15 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Elise Lennion Cc: hvaibhav.linux@gmail.com, johan@kernel.org, elder@kernel.org, outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] staging: greybus: Format block comments. Message-ID: <20161012144015.GA28533@kroah.com> References: <20161011031105.GA21887@lennorien.com> <20161012132401.GA22452@kroah.com> <20161012135508.GC5158@lennorien.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161012135508.GC5158@lennorien.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:55:08AM -0300, Elise Lennion wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 03:24:01PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > > > Does not apply to my tree :( > > > > Can you refresh this whole series and resend it? Keep the acks that > > were sent for some of the patches, and fix up the subject: lines. > > > > Ok, I'll create new patches containing the changes without ack. No, keep the acks, why delete them? > This one that doesn't apply, should I just drop it? Your tree is local > so I can't see what is different, to adjust the changes, until you push > the changes to staging-testing, right? My tree is pushed to staging-testing, so you should see this now. Is it not synced up somehow? thanks, greg k-h