From: "Emilio G. Cota" <cota@braap.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, alex.bennee@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] More thread sanitizer fixes and atomic.h improvements
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:45:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161012224510.GA3308@flamenco> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1476107947-31430-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 15:59:02 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> See each patch. My attempt at fixing whatever I did when I obviously
> didn't know enough^W about the C11 memory model, and at setting a
> better example for future generations...
Just for context. Building on this patchset, is it now time to
phase out smp_(rw)mb in favour or C11's acq/rel, as you laid
out in your KVM Forum talk [*]?
What is the plan with smp_mb_(sg)et? It's not clear to me from
the slides, but given patch 5 I don't see a reason to keep them.
Thanks,
Emilio
[*] http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/kvmforum16-atomic2.pdf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-12 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-10 13:59 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] More thread sanitizer fixes and atomic.h improvements Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-10 13:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] atomic: introduce smp_mb_acquire and smp_mb_release Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-10 15:29 ` Eric Blake
2016-10-10 16:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-10 13:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] cpus: use atomic_read to read seqlock-protected variables Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-12 8:44 ` Alex Bennée
2016-10-13 19:20 ` Emilio G. Cota
2016-10-13 20:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-10 13:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] qemu-thread: use acquire/release to clarify semantics of QemuEvent Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-12 9:21 ` Alex Bennée
2016-10-12 9:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-10 13:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] rcu: simplify memory barriers Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-10 13:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] atomic: base mb_read/mb_set on load-acquire and store-release Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-12 9:28 ` Alex Bennée
2016-10-12 9:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-20 18:36 ` Pranith Kumar
2016-10-10 16:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] More thread sanitizer fixes and atomic.h improvements no-reply
2016-10-11 19:21 ` no-reply
2016-10-12 11:32 ` Alex Bennée
2016-10-12 11:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-12 22:45 ` Emilio G. Cota [this message]
2016-10-13 7:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-13 19:29 ` Emilio G. Cota
2016-10-14 9:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-21 17:38 ` Alex Bennée
2016-10-22 9:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161012224510.GA3308@flamenco \
--to=cota@braap.org \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.