From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6339053517033963520 X-Received: by 10.200.40.111 with SMTP id 44mr1732755qtr.9.1476362987361; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 05:49:47 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.107.139.4 with SMTP id n4ls2148397iod.14.gmail; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 05:49:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.66.73.202 with SMTP id n10mr1463877pav.61.1476362982913; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 05:49:42 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org. [140.211.169.12]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 203si2323726pfw.0.2016.10.13.05.49.42 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Oct 2016 05:49:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gregkh@linuxfoundation.org designates 140.211.169.12 as permitted sender) client-ip=140.211.169.12; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gregkh@linuxfoundation.org designates 140.211.169.12 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Received: from localhost (pes75-3-78-192-101-3.fbxo.proxad.net [78.192.101.3]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0BF169C; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 12:49:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 14:49:50 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Varsha Rao Cc: outreachy-kernel , forest@alittletooquiet.net Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH] staging: vt6655: Replace BBvClearFOE by bbvclearfoe Message-ID: <20161013124950.GA16312@kroah.com> References: <5a2e45cf-903e-41c4-91d8-37d45aea9ce7@googlegroups.com> <21e853d5-b5bb-4b00-b1b5-7ec1a38145f6@googlegroups.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:37:55AM -0700, Varsha Rao wrote: Please turn off html email in your email client options. > > I think this is what you sent before, and that the macro is never used? > > > � �� Yes, this is the same.� > > > I have the impression that what you did wrong is to just remove > BBvClearFOE(dwIoBase) and not the entire macro definition (both lines). > > > �� > � �� I made a mistake there but my question remains the same like how to find > in what file a macro is stored if it cannot be found by grep or gcc -dN -E?� In that case, it is not used, so it can be removed, right? thanks, greg k-h